These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369131)

  • 1. A method for dose calculation for high energy photon beams based on measurements performed at reference depth.
    Bridier A; Dutreix A
    Acta Oncol; 1993; 32(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 8369131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of various beamlet sizes for IMRT with 6 MV photons.
    Sohn JW; Dempsey JF; Suh TS; Low DA
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2432-9. PubMed ID: 14528965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams.
    Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Arjomandy B; Ciangaru G; Lii M; Amos R; Wu R; Gillin MT
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5088-97. PubMed ID: 19070243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A consistent formalism for the application of phantom and collimator scatter factors.
    Venselaar JL; van Gasteren JJ; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van der Laarse R; Kleffens HJ; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):365-81. PubMed ID: 10070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators.
    Ahnesjö A; Weber L; Nilsson P
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1711-20. PubMed ID: 8587523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitor unit calculation in 6 MV irregularly shaped beams--accuracy in clinical practice.
    Lombardi P; Fiorino C; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):638-44. PubMed ID: 9227259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-reference condition correction factor kNR of typical radiation detectors applied for the dosimetry of high-energy photon fields in radiotherapy.
    Chofor N; Harder D; Poppe B
    Z Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 22(3):181-96. PubMed ID: 22658451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculating percent depth dose with the electron pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.
    Price MJ; Hogstrom KR; Antolak JA; White RA; Bloch CD; Boyd RA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 8(2):61-75. PubMed ID: 17592466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head scatter off-axis for megavoltage x rays.
    Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 12722805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detector-specific correction factors in radiosurgery beams and their impact on dose distribution calculations.
    García-Garduño OA; Rodríguez-Ávila MA; Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196393. PubMed ID: 29763446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limited accuracy of dose calculation for large fields at deep depths using the BrainSCAN v5.21 treatment planning system.
    Hsi WC; Zhang Y; Kirk MC; Bernard D; Chu JC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(2):12-8. PubMed ID: 15940208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of dose delivery based on a comparison of dosimetry calculations using open beam and wedged beam depth dose data.
    Ho AK; Podgorsak MB; Sibata CH; Shin KH
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 8703325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose uncertainties in photon pencil kernel calculations at off-axis positions.
    Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3418-25. PubMed ID: 17022238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors?
    Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van Gasteren JJ; van Kleffens HJ; van der Laarse R; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2369-81. PubMed ID: 9434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols.
    Huq MS; Hwang MS; Teo TP; Jang SY; Heron DE; Lalonde RJ
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30009526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.