These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369178)

  • 1. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor at a workstation and at a personal.
    Lyttkens K; Kehler M; Andersson B; Carlsen S; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Strömbäck A
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8369178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Arnadóttir E; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Lundin A; Lyttkens K; Kheddache K; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bedside chest radiography using digital luminescence. A comparison between digital radiographs reviewed on a personal computer and as hard-copies.
    Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Kehler M; Lindberg L
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):427-30. PubMed ID: 1389649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of inverted digital luminescence radiography in evaluating chest neoplasms.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Hochbergs P; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Lönntoft M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Nov; 32(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 1742124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.
    Doyle AJ; Le Fevre J; Anderson GD
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):872-7. PubMed ID: 16237135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of digital chest radiographs: comparison of light emitting diode versus cold cathode fluorescent lamp backlit monitors.
    Lim HJ; Chung MJ; Lee G; Yie M; Shin KE; Moon JW; Lee KS
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 24265575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
    Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.
    Lams PM; Cocklin ML
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 3940365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic capability of digital radiography of the chest using scanning laser stimulated luminescence].
    Onitsuka H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 49(2):177-90. PubMed ID: 2755785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel display technique for reference images for visibility of temporal change on radiographs--color digital summation radiography.
    Ogata Y; Naito H; Azuma H; Toyota H; Ueguchi T; Matsumoto M; Tamura S; Nakamura sH; Johkoh T
    Radiat Med; 2006 Jan; 24(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 16715659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians.
    Parasyn A; Hanson RM; Peat JK; De Silva M
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Feb; 11(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9502325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.