These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369192)

  • 1. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification.
    McNamara MM; Lockhart ME; Fineberg NS; Berland LL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 20966319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. Iohexol of different concentrations as a gastrointestinal contrast medium.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 7619619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
    Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
    Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow properties of oral contrast medium formulations depend on the temperature.
    Ekberg O; Stading M; Johansson D; Bülow M; Ekman S; Wendin K
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 20380600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Telebrix Gastro and Gastrografin in abdominal computed tomography.
    van Waes PF; Feldberg MA; Barth P
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 2806274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
    Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
    Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide].
    Schmiedel E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
    Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A double-blind study comparing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ioversol-350 and iohexol-350 in coronary arteriography with left ventriculography.
    McGaughey MD; Remetz MS; Sharf-Bornhofen E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1991; 3(6):272-7. PubMed ID: 10149109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis.
    Horton KM; Fishman EK; Gayler B
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 18379303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
    Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
    Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Bach DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Oral contrast media in CT: improvement by addition of guar?].
    Conrad R; Schneider G; Wilhelm K; Speck U; Schild H
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 9465948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.