180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369192)
1. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification.
McNamara MM; Lockhart ME; Fineberg NS; Berland LL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 20966319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. Iohexol of different concentrations as a gastrointestinal contrast medium.
Lönnemark M; Magnusson A
Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 7619619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow properties of oral contrast medium formulations depend on the temperature.
Ekberg O; Stading M; Johansson D; Bülow M; Ekman S; Wendin K
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 20380600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Telebrix Gastro and Gastrografin in abdominal computed tomography.
van Waes PF; Feldberg MA; Barth P
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 2806274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A double-blind study comparing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ioversol-350 and iohexol-350 in coronary arteriography with left ventriculography.
McGaughey MD; Remetz MS; Sharf-Bornhofen E
J Invasive Cardiol; 1991; 3(6):272-7. PubMed ID: 10149109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis.
Horton KM; Fishman EK; Gayler B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 18379303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
Bach DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Oral contrast media in CT: improvement by addition of guar?].
Conrad R; Schneider G; Wilhelm K; Speck U; Schild H
Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 9465948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
Zwaan M; Gmelin E
Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
