132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369211)
21. Subclinical immune responses to nickel in sensitized individuals-a dose-response study.
Wennervaldt M; Vaher H; Ahlström MG; Bischofberger N; Menné T; Thyssen JP; Johansen JD; Bonefeld CM
Contact Dermatitis; 2024 Jul; 91(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 38577784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The significance of previous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hypersensitivity to nickel.
Hindsén M; Bruze M; Christensen OB
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 9330814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pretreatment of the test area with 1-day occlusion improves the response rate to NiSO4 5% pet. patch tests in subjects with a positive history of nickel allergy.
Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8565454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nickel chloride/chlorides of divalent metal interactions in nickel-sensitive subjects.
Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M
Exp Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 5(5):254-9. PubMed ID: 8981023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single doses of local betamethasone do not suppress allergic patch test reactions to nickel sulfate.
Molander G; Petman L; Kannas L; Lauerma AI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Apr; 50(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 15186376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cobalt allergy: suitable test concentration, and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium.
Lidén C; Andersson N; Julander A; Matura M
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Jun; 74(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 26996152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Studies on the reproducibility of allergic contact dermatitis.
Memon AA; Friedmann PS
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 8746331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
Serup J; Staberg B
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ELISpot: a new tool for the detection of nickel sensitization.
Lindemann M; Böhmer J; Zabel M; Grosse-Wilde H
Clin Exp Allergy; 2003 Jul; 33(7):992-8. PubMed ID: 12859458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lymphocyte transformation induced by nickel sulphate: an in vitro study of subjects with and without a positive nickel patch test.
Svejgaard E; Morling N; Svejgaard A; Veien NK
Acta Derm Venereol; 1978; 58(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 78640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fast itch relief in an experimental model for methylprednisolone aceponate topical corticosteroid activity, based on allergic contact eczema to nickel sulphate.
Curto L; Carnero L; López-Aventin D; Traveria G; Roura G; Giménez-Arnau AM
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2014 Oct; 28(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 24612282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of patch testing with nickel sulfate in TRUE Test and in petrolatum at 2.5% and 5% concentrations.
Bach RO; Svendsen MT; Mose KF; Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Mar; 86(3):233-234. PubMed ID: 34800302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Allergic contact dermatitis due to nickel: descriptive study in a tertiary hospital, 2000-2010.
García-Rabasco AE; Zaragozá-Ninet V; García-Ruíz R; de la Cuadra-Oyanguren J
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2014; 105(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 24530124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dose per unit area - a study of elicitation of nickel allergy.
Fischer LA; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17441846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reactivity to euro coins and sensitization thresholds in nickel-sensitive subjects.
Seidenari S; Giusti F; Pellacani G; Antelmi AR; Foti C; Bonamonte D; Ayala F; Balato G; Cristaudo A; Stingeni L; Lisi P
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15987291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patch testing for nickel allergy. The influence of the vehicle on the response rate to topical nickel sulphate.
Mendelow AY; Forsyth A; Florence AT; Baillie AJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jul; 13(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 4042642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The 'angry back': a new concept or old confusion?
Kligman A; Gollhausen R
Br J Dermatol; 1986 Aug; 115 Suppl 31():93-100. PubMed ID: 2943313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Flare-up reactions after oral challenge with nickel in relation to challenge dose and intensity and time of previous patch test reactions.
Hindsén M; Bruze M; Christensen OB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Apr; 44(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 11260535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patch testing in children from 2005 to 2012: results from the North American contact dermatitis group.
Zug KA; Pham AK; Belsito DV; DeKoven JG; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Zirwas MJ
Dermatitis; 2014; 25(6):345-55. PubMed ID: 25384228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
