These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369392)

  • 21. Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1215-34. PubMed ID: 11304737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins.
    Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sample sizes based on the log-rank statistic in complex clinical trials.
    Lakatos E
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):229-41. PubMed ID: 3358991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two-stage test of independence using Kendall's statistic.
    Spurrier JD; Hewett JE
    Biometrics; 1980 Sep; 36(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 7213913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Test for interaction between treatment and stratum with ordinal responses.
    Uesaka H
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 8513097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating the power of the two-sample Wilcoxon test for location shift.
    Collings BJ; Hamilton MA
    Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):847-60. PubMed ID: 3203133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.
    Tu XM; Kowalski J; Crits-Christoph P; Gallop R
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2587-606. PubMed ID: 16025545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Choice of test for association in small sample unordered r x c tables.
    Lydersen S; Pradhan V; Senchaudhuri P; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4328-43. PubMed ID: 17311220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Large sample tests for binary outcomes in fixed-dose combination drug studies.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):498-503. PubMed ID: 9192448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exact inference for matched case-control studies.
    Hirji KF; Mehta CR; Patel NR
    Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):803-14. PubMed ID: 3203129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sample size and statistical power assessing the effect of interventions in the context of mixture distributions with detection limits.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2647-57. PubMed ID: 16456897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time.
    Klein JP; Logan B; Harhoff M; Andersen PK
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4505-19. PubMed ID: 17348080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose-response curves.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16256244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Likelihoods and TDT for the case-parents design.
    Schaid DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 10096688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies.
    Gao XJ; Klar N; Donner A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):349-63. PubMed ID: 9271709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of procedures for testing the equality of survival distributions.
    Joe H; Koziol JA; Petkau AJ
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):327-40. PubMed ID: 7272418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):115-31. PubMed ID: 18482478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
    Correa JA; Bellavance F
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.