These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369392)

  • 41. Gene-dropping vs. empirical variance estimation for allele-sharing linkage statistics.
    Jung J; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):652-65. PubMed ID: 16917920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exact two-sample inference with missing data.
    Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):524-31. PubMed ID: 16011700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores.
    Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distribution-free confidence intervals for a parameter of Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney type for ordered categories and progressive censoring.
    Halperin M; Hamdy MI; Thall PF
    Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):509-21. PubMed ID: 2765635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Power and sample size determination for noninferiority trials using an exact method.
    Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12477069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Homogeneity test of rate ratios in stratified matched-pair studies.
    Li HQ; Tang NS
    Biom J; 2011 Jul; 53(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 21608010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A modified Wilcoxon test for non-negative distributions with a clump of zeros.
    Hallstrom AP
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 19941301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-sample rank tests for detecting changes that occur in a small proportion of the treated population.
    Johnson RA; Verrill S; Moore DH
    Biometrics; 1987 Sep; 43(3):641-55. PubMed ID: 3663821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Detecting dose-response using contrasts: asymptotic power and sample size determination for binomial data.
    Bretz F; Hothorn LA
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3325-35. PubMed ID: 12407675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nonparametric procedures for comparing umbrella pattern treatment effects with a control in a one-way layout.
    Chen YI; Wolfe DA
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):455-65. PubMed ID: 8369381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exact and Monte carlo resampling procedures for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):749-54. PubMed ID: 11153842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Size and power estimation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for ordered categorical data.
    Tang Y
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(29):3461-70. PubMed ID: 22086799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On approximate sample sizes for comparing two independent proportions with the use of Yates' correction.
    Ury HK; Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 7407322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.
    Connor RJ
    Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):207-11. PubMed ID: 3567305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Kappa as an index of reproducibility: distribution under the null-hypothesis.
    Mazoyer B; Mary JY
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1987; 35(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 3441658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of exact tests for trend with binary endpoints using Bartholomew's statistic.
    Consiglio JD; Shan G; Wilding GE
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. F-type statistics and the analysis of binomial data with overdispersion.
    Mauromoustakos A; McNew RW
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Jul; 4(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 7951274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An application of methods for clustered binary responses to a cardiovascular study with small sample size.
    Luta G; Koch GG; Cascio WE; Smith WT
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9547429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Proportions with extraneous variance: two dependent samples.
    Kleinman JC
    Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 1174627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.