These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369546)
1. Aided masked thresholds: case of deception. Balfour PB; Hawkins DB J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jul; 4(4):272-4. PubMed ID: 8369546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship of acoustic gain to aided threshold improvement in children. Jirsa RE; Norris TW J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 Aug; 43(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 692100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An alternate method for determining functional gain of hearing aids. Rines D; Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 6521471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL). Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use. Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Some theoretical considerations concerning the relation between functional gain and insertion gain. Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):491-6. PubMed ID: 3172768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements. Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification. Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effect of a hearing aid on progressive hearing loss]. Azema B; Virole B; Huyghe B; Chapuy P; Avan P; Degove F; Renglet T; Paulissen D; Lagadec S Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(5):239-47. PubMed ID: 7755301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli. Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction. Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity. Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Moore BC; Laurence RF; Wright D Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 4063555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern. Mueller HG; Weber J; Bellanova M Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-frequency amplification with ITC-HA and BTE-HA. A comparative investigation. von Buchwald C; Pedersen F; Parving A Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 1842276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain. Dillon H J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss. Gagné JP J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 3411023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves. Florentine M Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality. Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21319935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]