These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
20 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369840)
1. Blue Cross protects the people, who protects Blue Cross? HAWLEY PR Del State Med J; 1950 Jan; 22(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 15408944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Blue cross blue shield of Minnesota: missing the forest for the trees. Neville B J Man Manip Ther; 2008; 16(4):E103-4. PubMed ID: 19771183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Judge Posner's RFP: antitrust law and managed care. Sage WM Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(6):44-61. PubMed ID: 9444808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ore. upstart takes on rival. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2002 Feb; 32(6):18-9, 21. PubMed ID: 11892528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Most Favored Nation clauses require close scrutiny. Roeder KH Ga Hosp Today; 1995 Nov; 39(11):3. PubMed ID: 10152770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ore. hospital appeals dismissal of lawsuit. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1992 Sep; 22(39):63. PubMed ID: 10120611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. States may become battleground in push for collective bargaining. Carroll J Manag Care; 2002 Jun; 11(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 12098869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Narrowing provider choice: any willing provider laws after New York Blue Cross v. Travelers. McCarthy D Am J Law Med; 1997; 23(1):97-113. PubMed ID: 9199734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nine New Jersey hospitals charge Blue Cross with antitrust. Beth Israel Hospital et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. Hudson T Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Sep; 67(18):62. PubMed ID: 8369840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining exclusionary conduct of HMOs and PPOs: a case comment on Northwest Medical Laboratories v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oregon. Levitt DM Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(3):271-88. PubMed ID: 1785621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]