BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

849 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8369867)

  • 1. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity.
    Marque CK; Terrien J; Rihana S; Germain G
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jun; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17570165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy.
    Buhimschi C; Garfield RE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 174(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 8623816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine electromyography for discrimination of labor imminence in women with threatened preterm labor under tocolytic treatment.
    Mas-Cabo J; Prats-Boluda G; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J; Alberola-Rubio J; Ye-Lin Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Feb; 57(2):401-411. PubMed ID: 30159659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of stimulatory and inhibitory drugs on uterine electrical activity measured noninvasively from the abdominal surface of pregnant rats.
    Buhimschi CS; Saade GR; Buhimschi IA; Gokdeniz R; Boyle MB; Garfield RE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 183(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10920311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization and automatic classification of preterm and term uterine records.
    Jager F; Libenšek S; Geršak K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202125. PubMed ID: 30153264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of frequency-related parameters of the electrohysterogram for predicting preterm delivery: a review of the literature.
    Vinken MP; Rabotti C; Mischi M; Oei SG
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2009 Aug; 64(8):529-41. PubMed ID: 19624864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound analysis of the uterine wall movement for improved electrohysterographic measurement and modeling.
    Rabotti C; de Lau H; Haazen N; Oei G; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7436-9. PubMed ID: 24111464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of EHG contractions at term labor by nonlinear analysis.
    Garcia-Gonzalez MT; Charleston-Villalobos S; Vargas-Garcia C; Gonzalez-Camarena R; Aljama-Corrales T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7432-5. PubMed ID: 24111463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An electro-mechanical multiscale model of uterine pregnancy contraction.
    Yochum M; Laforêt J; Marque C
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Oct; 77():182-94. PubMed ID: 27567400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.