These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8370487)
1. [Surgical treatment of recurrent stress incontinence: Burch versus lyodura sling operation--a prospective study]. Enzelsberger H; Kurz C; Seifert M; Raimann H; Schatten C Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jul; 53(7):467-71. PubMed ID: 8370487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Burch and lyodura sling procedures for repair of unsuccessful incontinence surgery. Enzelsberger H; Helmer H; Schatten C Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 88(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 8692511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pubo-fascial versus vaginal sling operation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study. Rodrigues P; Hering F; Meler A; Campagnari JC; D'Império M Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(7):627-31. PubMed ID: 15382188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mersilene mesh sling: short- and long-term clinical and urodynamic outcomes. Young SB; Howard AE; Baker SP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11483900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?]. Pfitzenmaier J; Gilfrich C; Faldum A; Müller M; Hohenfellner M; Thüroff JW Aktuelle Urol; 2003 May; 34(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 14566688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prolene mesh sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Integral treatment of pelvic floor anomalies. Long-term results]. Romero Maroto J; Prieto Chaparro L; López López C; Quilez Fenoll JM; Bolufer Nadal S Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Nov; 55(9):1057-74. PubMed ID: 12564066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension. Cayan F; Dilek S; Akbay E; Cayan S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 277(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17653739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Urodynamic results of Burch colposuspension]. Schürmann R; Ralph G Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(9):577-81. PubMed ID: 2378188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of urodynamic findings before and after loop operations for recurrent incontinence]. Enzelsberger H; Sagl R; Heytmanek G; Schatten C; Wagner G Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 48(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 3378694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up. Sharifiaghdas F; Mortazavi N Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 18408389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trans-obturator urethral sling for the surgical correction of female stress urinary incontinence: outside-in (Monarc) versus inside-out (TVT-O). Are the two ways reassuring? Debodinance P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Aug; 133(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 16793194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]