These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8370871)

  • 1. Internal stress wave measurements in solids subjected to lithotripter pulses.
    Gracewski SM; Dahake G; Ding Z; Burns SJ; Everbach EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):652-61. PubMed ID: 8370871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shifting the Split Reflectors to Enhance Stone Fragmentation of Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1876-89. PubMed ID: 27166016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.
    Zhou Y; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3625-36. PubMed ID: 16838506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shock wave-inertial microbubble interaction: methodology, physical characterization, and bioeffect study.
    Zhong P; Lin H; Xi X; Zhu S; Bhogte ES
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 10089617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Focusing of shock waves induced by optical breakdown in water.
    Sankin GN; Zhou Y; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4071-81. PubMed ID: 18537359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acoustic fields of the Wolf electrohydraulic lithotripter.
    Campbell DS; Flynn HG; Blackstock DT; Linke C; Carstensen EL
    J Lithotr Stone Dis; 1991 Apr; 3(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 10149155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. I. Liquid-solid interface conditions.
    Dahake G; Gracewski SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2125-37. PubMed ID: 9348674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: methodology and in vitro experiments.
    Zhong P; Zhou Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3283-91. PubMed ID: 11785829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical haemolysis in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): II. In vitro cell lysis due to shear.
    Lokhandwalla M; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Sturtevant B
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1245-64. PubMed ID: 11324963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. II. Effect of geometry.
    Dahake G; Gracewski SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2138-45. PubMed ID: 9348675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A suppressor to prevent direct wave-induced cavitation in shock wave therapy devices.
    Matula TJ; Hilmo PR; Bailey MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 16119340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling of an electrohydraulic lithotripter with the KZK equation.
    Averkiou MA; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 10420620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. I. Acoustic fields.
    Bailey MR; Blackstock DT; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2517-24. PubMed ID: 10491712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined short and long-delay tandem shock waves to improve shock wave lithotripsy according to the Gilmore-Akulichev theory.
    de Icaza-Herrera M; Fernández F; Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():53-9. PubMed ID: 25553714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. II. Cavitation fields.
    Bailey MR; Blackstock DT; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1149-60. PubMed ID: 10462818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field.
    Sokolov DL; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1685-95. PubMed ID: 11572377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic photoelastic study of the transient stress field in solids during shock wave lithotripsy.
    Xi X; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1226-39. PubMed ID: 11303936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Qin J; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2635-45. PubMed ID: 20370044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Damage to murine kidney and intestine from exposure to the fields of a piezoelectric lithotripter.
    Raeman CH; Child SZ; Dalecki D; Mayer R; Parker KJ; Carstensen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 7998379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of shock wave lithotripters via cavitation potential.
    Iloreta JI; Zhou Y; Sankin GN; Zhong P; Szeri AJ
    Phys Fluids (1994); 2007; 19(8):86103. PubMed ID: 19865493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.