These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Context effects in perception of vowels differentiated by F Mills HE; Shorey AE; Theodore RM; Stilp CE J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):55. PubMed ID: 35931547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The time course of auditory segregation: concurrent vowels that vary in duration. McKeown JD; Patterson RD J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1866-77. PubMed ID: 7593912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum. Kasturi K; Loizou PC; Dorman M; Spahr T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1102-11. PubMed ID: 12243158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination of vowels in consonantal context. Kewley-Port D J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3139-46. PubMed ID: 7759654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space. Kewley-Port D; Atal BS J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Loizou PC; Poroy O J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Role of formant transitions. Assmann PF J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1141-52. PubMed ID: 8759967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Role of F0 and amplitude in the perception of intervocalic glottal stops. Hillenbrand JM; Houde RA J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1182-90. PubMed ID: 8959603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues. Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Johnson LB; Oh SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 26233007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing identification of standardized and regionally valid vowels. Wright R; Souza P J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):182-93. PubMed ID: 22199181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating. Culling JF; Darwin CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1559-69. PubMed ID: 8176059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dynamic specification of coarticulated German vowels: perceptual and acoustical studies. Strange W; Bohn OS J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):488-504. PubMed ID: 9670540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of extraneous sounds on the perceptual estimation of first-formant frequency in vowels. Roberts B; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2571-83. PubMed ID: 2283430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perception of back vowels: effects of varying F1 - F0 Bark distance. Fahey RP; Diehl RL; Traunmüller H J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2350-7. PubMed ID: 8730081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]