These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8370975)

  • 1. Differential patterns of epidermal leukocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally unrelated chemical irritants.
    Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
    J Invest Dermatol; 1993 Sep; 101(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 8370975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential effects of structurally unrelated chemical irritants on the density of proliferating keratinocytes in 48 h patch test reactions.
    Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
    J Invest Dermatol; 1992 Oct; 99(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 1402003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effects of structurally unrelated chemical irritants on the density and morphology of epidermal CD1+ cells.
    Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
    J Invest Dermatol; 1990 Dec; 95(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 1701190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study.
    Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
    J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Nov; 93(5):695-9. PubMed ID: 2794551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contact thermography for assessment of skin damage due to experimental irritants.
    Agner T; Serup J
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 2455410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimentally-induced irritant contact dermatitis. Determination of optimum irritant concentrations.
    Willis CM; Stephens JM; Wilkinson JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 3349774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants.
    Nicander I; Ollmar S; Eek A; Lundh Rozell B; Emtestam L
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8746333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decreased number and function of antigen-presenting cells in the skin following application of irritant agents: relevance for skin cancer?
    Lisby S; Baadsgaard O; Cooper KD; Vejlsgaard GL
    J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 92(6):842-7. PubMed ID: 2786039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential epidermal expression of the invariant chain in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Emilson A; Lindberg M; Scheynius A
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 9833035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.
    Agner T; Serup J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 May; 20(5):352-9. PubMed ID: 2670419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by polysulfide rubber replica.
    Agner T; Serup J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Oct; 17(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 3427947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lymphocyte subsets and Langerhans cells in allergic and irritant patch test reactions: histometric studies.
    Ferguson J; Gibbs JH; Beck JS
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Sep; 13(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 2932284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective expression of immune-associated surface antigens by keratinocytes in irritant contact dermatitis.
    Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
    J Invest Dermatol; 1991 Apr; 96(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 1706746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Susceptibility to primary irritants: age dependence and relation to contact allergic reactions.
    Coenraads PJ; Bleumink E; Nater JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975 Dec; 1(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 1235298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidermal Langerhans cell apoptosis is induced in vivo by nonanoic acid but not by sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Forsey RJ; Shahidullah H; Sands C; McVittie E; Aldridge RD; Hunter JA; Howie SE
    Br J Dermatol; 1998 Sep; 139(3):453-61. PubMed ID: 9767290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological findings in cumulative irritation induced by SLS and croton oil in hairless mice.
    Moon SH; Seo KI; Han WS; Suh DH; Cho KH; Kim JJ; Eun HC
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Apr; 44(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 11260241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonanoic acid--an experimental irritant.
    Wahlberg JE; Lindberg M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 14678207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Irritants' increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis.
    McLelland J; Shuster S; Matthews JN
    Arch Dermatol; 1991 Jul; 127(7):1016-9. PubMed ID: 2064399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential effects of sodium lauryl sulphate and non-anoic acid on the expression of CD1a and ICAM-1 in human epidermis.
    Lindberg M; Färm G; Scheynius A
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1991; 71(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 1684465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced levels of glutathione S-transferases in patch test reactions to dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate as demonstrated by quantitative immunocytochemistry: evidence for oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis.
    Willis CM; Britton LE; Reiche L; Wilkinson JD
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11275802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.