177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8370975)
41. Fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy for in vivo imaging of epidermal reactions to two experimental irritants.
Suihko C; Serup J
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 18937788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry.
Freeman S; Maibach H
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 3049697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Sodium lauryl sulfate irritant patch tests. III. Evaporation of aqueous vehicle influences inflammatory response.
Dahl MV; Roering MJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1984 Sep; 11(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 6480951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patch test reactions at 48 h and 96 h in 152 subjects.
Reiche L; Willis C; Wilkinson J; Shaw S; de Lacharrière O
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 9840260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Increased skin reactivity to primary irritants provoked by hand eczema.
Björnberg A
Arch Dermatol Forsch; 1974 Jun; 249(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 4407532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Phenotypic characterization of the early cellular responses in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Gawkrodger DJ; McVittie E; Carr MM; Ross JA; Hunter JA
Clin Exp Immunol; 1986 Dec; 66(3):590-8. PubMed ID: 3552336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Assessment of irritant skin reactions using electrical impedance--a comparison between 2 laboratories.
Kuzmina N; Duval C; Johnsson S; Boman A; Lindberg M; Emtestam L
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14641117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions.
Homey B; von Schilling C; Blümel J; Schuppe HC; Ruzicka T; Ahr HJ; Lehmann P; Vohr HW
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 153(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 9875302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
Serup J; Staberg B
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A study of skin responses to follow-up, rechallenge and combined effects of irritants using non-invasive measurements.
Park KB; Eun HC
J Dermatol Sci; 1995 Sep; 10(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8534615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In vivo cytokine profiles in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Hoefakker S; Caubo M; van 't Erve EH; Roggeveen MJ; Boersma WJ; van Joost T; Notten WR; Claassen E
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Oct; 33(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 8654078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Lymphocytes and Langerhans cells in patch tests. An immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study.
Kanerva L; Ranki A; Lauharanta J
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 6388994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Value of the cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity (CBH) response for distinguishing weak contact sensitization from irritation reactions in the guinea pig.
Robinson MK; Fletcher ER; Johnson GR; Wyder WE; Maurer JK
J Invest Dermatol; 1990 May; 94(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 2324519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Thermographic assessment of patch-test responses.
Baillie AJ; Biagioni PA; Forsyth A; Garioch JJ; Mcpherson D
Br J Dermatol; 1990 Mar; 122(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 2322498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Common pathogenetic pathways in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Brasch J; Burgard J; Sterry W
J Invest Dermatol; 1992 Feb; 98(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 1370676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sodium lauryl sulfate irritant patch tests. II. Variations of test responses among subjects and comparison to variations of allergic responses elicited by Toxicodendron extract.
Dahl MV; Pass F; Trancik RJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1984 Sep; 11(3):474-7. PubMed ID: 6237135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Immunocytochemical demonstration of reduced Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase levels following topical application of dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate: an indication of the role of oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis.
Willis CM; Reiche L; Wilkinson JD
Eur J Dermatol; 1998; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 9649716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Mechanisms of chemically induced skin irritation. I. Studies of time course, dose response, and components of inflammation in the laboratory mouse.
Patrick E; Maibach HI; Burkhalter A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1985 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):476-90. PubMed ID: 4082196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The CXCR3 activating chemokines IP-10, Mig, and IP-9 are expressed in allergic but not in irritant patch test reactions.
Flier J; Boorsma DM; Bruynzeel DP; Van Beek PJ; Stoof TJ; Scheper RJ; Willemze R; Tensen CP
J Invest Dermatol; 1999 Oct; 113(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 10504443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
