BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8371087)

  • 1. Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.
    Lewellen MJ; Goldinger SD; Pisoni DB; Greene BG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1993 Sep; 122(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 8371087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
    Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of blend words in naming and sentence reading.
    Johnson RL; Slate SR; Teevan AR; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):847-857. PubMed ID: 29554832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
    Burt JS; Jared D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1302-21. PubMed ID: 26158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. With or without semantic mediation: retrieval of lexical representations in sign production.
    Navarrete E; Caccaro A; Pavani F; Mahon BZ; Peressotti F
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2015 Apr; 20(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 25583708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for the modulation of sub-lexical processing in go no-go naming: the elimination of the frequency × regularity interaction.
    Cummine J; Amyotte J; Pancheshen B; Chouinard B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2011 Dec; 40(5-6):367-78. PubMed ID: 21928093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in semantic processing: Insights from the Calgary semantic decision project.
    Pexman PM; Yap MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1091-1112. PubMed ID: 29481104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid automatized naming and lexical decision in children from an electrophysiological perspective.
    González-Garrido AA; Gómez-Velázquez FR; Zarabozo D; Ruiz-Villeda BA; de la Serna Tuya JM
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 42(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 21309438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of deletion neighbourhood frequency and individual differences in lexical decision, progressive demasking, and naming.
    Dujardin E; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Jun; 74(2):111-124. PubMed ID: 31647252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.