These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8371180)

  • 1. Effect of plasma treatment on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP; Nilner K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 8371180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP
    J Dent; 1993 Oct; 21(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 8227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8180615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts.
    Cullen DR; Mikesell JW; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 1774689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Setchell DJ; Wickens JL
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jul; 6(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 2086288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study to determine the wettability and castability of different elastomeric impression materials.
    Reddy GV; Reddy NS; Itttigi J; Jagadeesh KN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 22918010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
    Teraoka F; Takahashi J
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
    Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface properties and castability of elastomeric impression materials after plasma cleaning.
    Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N; Nilner K
    Dent Mater; 1992 Nov; 8(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 1303381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge.
    Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 8254551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials.
    Adabo GL; Zanarotti E; Fonseca RG; Cruz CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 10220669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical significance of surface activation of silicone impression materials.
    Boening KW; Walter MH; Schuette U
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):447-52. PubMed ID: 9699436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
    Tjan AH; Li T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.