These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8371557)

  • 1. Interference of herbal drinks with urinalysis for drugs of abuse.
    Winek CL; Elzein EO; Wahba WW; Feldman JA
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993; 17(4):246-7. PubMed ID: 8371557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse.
    Warner A
    Clin Chem; 1989 Apr; 35(4):648-51. PubMed ID: 2539273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the novel immunoassay TRIAGE to a rapid detection of antemortem drug abuse.
    Röhrich J; Schmidt K; Bratzke H
    J Anal Toxicol; 1994; 18(7):407-14. PubMed ID: 7861755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse.
    Schwarzhoff R; Cody JT
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993; 17(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 8429620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of Abusign drugs-of-abuse slide tests with particluar emphasis on concentrations near the cutoff: comparison with FPIA-ADx and confirmation of results with GC-MS.
    Ros JJ; Pelders MG; Egberts AC
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998; 22(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 9491967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The determination of drugs of abuse in whole blood by means of FPIA and EMIT-dau immunoassays--a comparative study.
    Bogusz M; Aderjan R; Schmitt G; Nadler E; Neureither B
    Forensic Sci Int; 1990 Nov; 48(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 2279719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Discrepant results with immunohistochemical detection TDx/ADx?].
    Franke M; Goenechea S; Heinbach F
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1992; 50():105-9. PubMed ID: 1489309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multiple-site laboratory evaluation of three on-site urinalysis drug-testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Frank JF; Farrell LJ; Karsch HM; Klaunig JE
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998 Oct; 22(6):493-502. PubMed ID: 9788525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First analytical chemistry study on drug abuse in the Buenos Aires (Argentina) University students.
    Quiroga PN; Panzuto RI; Alvarez GB; Mirson DJ; Ochoa CF; Assem EM; López CM; Schkolnik LC; Villaamil EC; Roses OE
    Farmaco; 1998 Jun; 53(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 9764470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening method for the detection of methamphetamine in hair using fluorescence polarization immunoassay.
    Cheong JC; Suh S; Ko BJ; Lee JI; Kim JY; Suh YJ; In MK
    J Anal Toxicol; 2013 May; 37(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 23467260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drugs-of-abuse testing in urine: statistical approach and experimental comparison of immunochemical and chromatographic techniques.
    Ferrara SD; Tedeschi L; Frison G; Brusini G; Castagna F; Bernardelli B; Soregaroli D
    J Anal Toxicol; 1994 Sep; 18(5):278-91. PubMed ID: 7990448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening of several drugs of abuse in Italian workplace drug testing: performance comparisons of on-site screening tests and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay-based device.
    Basilicata P; Pieri M; Settembre V; Galdiero A; Della Casa E; Acampora A; Miraglia N
    Anal Chem; 2011 Nov; 83(22):8566-74. PubMed ID: 21992470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of drugs in human hair using Abbott ADx, with confirmation by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
    Kintz P; Ludes B; Mangin P
    J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):328-31. PubMed ID: 1545208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug screening in urine by cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) and kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS): a comparative study.
    Schwettmann L; Külpmann WR; Vidal C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 16599844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive predictive values of abused drug immunoassays on the Beckman Synchron in a veteran population.
    Dietzen DJ; Ecos K; Friedman D; Beason S
    J Anal Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 25(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 11327349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of the MTP immunoassay with EMIT in blood screening for drugs].
    Käferstein H; Sticht G
    Arch Kriminol; 1998; 202(5-6):165-72. PubMed ID: 10023491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization and validation of CEDIA drugs of abuse immunoassay tests in serum on Hitachi 912.
    Kirschbaum KM; Musshoff F; Schmithausen R; Stockhausen S; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 21775079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing for drugs of abuse in meconium of newborn infants.
    Moriya F; Chan KM; Noguchi TT; Wu PY
    J Anal Toxicol; 1994; 18(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8127083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the detection of drugs of abuse in human whole blood.
    Keller T; Schneider A; Dirnhofer R; Jungo R; Meyer W
    Med Sci Law; 2000 Jul; 40(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 10976190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abbott phencyclidine and barbiturates abused drug assays: evaluation and comparison of ADx FPIA, TDx FPIA, EMIT, and GC/MS methods.
    Caplan YH; Levine B
    J Anal Toxicol; 1989; 13(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 2693834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.