These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case. Lang S Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should the government assure scientific integrity? Klein DF Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 8396939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions. Fox MF; Braxton JM J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy. Kornfeld DS Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct. Hackett EJ J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The logical geography of concepts and shared responsibilities concerning research misconduct. Guenin LM Acad Med; 1996 Jun; 71(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 9125915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. US Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fraud and sloppiness in science. Schmaus W Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Which ethics for science and public policy? Irving DN; Shamoo AE Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):77-100. PubMed ID: 11652298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Problems in research integrity arising from misconceptions about the ownership of research. Fields KL; Price AR Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S60-4. PubMed ID: 8373493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value issues in biomedical science: public concerns and professional complacency. Bellett A Immunol Cell Biol; 1992 Dec; 70(Pt. 6):363-8. PubMed ID: 11652209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors. Yankauer A Am J Public Health; 1990 Apr; 80(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 2316756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Integrity in science: a constant concern]. Drenth PJ Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):321-33. PubMed ID: 15641563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]