138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8374118)
1. [Image quality evaluation and dosage requirements of digital image intensifier radiography].
Braunschweig R; Bauer J; Seeger W
Rofo; 1993 Sep; 159(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 8374118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Digital radiography].
Schnakenberg B
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(4):317-38. PubMed ID: 2236539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital image intensifier radiography--what dose for what clinical problem?].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jan; 2(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 1547288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
Seifert H; Chapot C
J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Obstetric pelvimetry using digital image intensifier radiography].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Wischnik A; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Nov; 151(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 2554407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical aspects of image quality and doses in gated pulsed imaging].
Vetter S; Heckmann H; Strecker EP; Busch HP; Kamm KF; Allmendinger H
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jul; 8(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 9759466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction fluoroscopy in pediatrics.
Lederman HM; Khademian ZP; Felice M; Hurh PJ
Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Dec; 32(12):844-8. PubMed ID: 12447587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L
Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose.
Uffmann M; Schaefer-Prokop C
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 19628349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
