These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8374416)
1. National Health Service breast screening programme results for 1991-2. Chamberlain J; Moss SM; Kirkpatrick AE; Michell M; Johns L BMJ; 1993 Aug; 307(6900):353-6. PubMed ID: 8374416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results from the NHS breast screening programme 1990-1993. Moss SM; Michel M; Patnick J; Johns L; Blanks R; Chamberlain J J Med Screen; 1995; 2(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 8719146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian mammography screening programmes--1996-2004. Giordano L; Giorgi D; Piccini P; Ventura L; Stefanini V; Senore C; Paci E; Segnan N Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):21-32. PubMed ID: 17824360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of two view and one view mammography in the detection of small invasive cancers: results from the National Health Service breast screening programme. Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG J Med Screen; 1996; 3(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 9041485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme. Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 9275268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92. Otten JD; van Dijck JA; Peer PG; Straatman H; Verbeek AL; Mravunac M; Hendriks JH; Holland R J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 8935470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring and evaluating the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: evaluating the variation in radiological performance between individual programmes using PPV-referral diagrams. Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG J Med Screen; 2001; 8(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 11373846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Breast Cancer Screening Programme, Singapore: evaluation of participation and performance indicators. Loy EY; Molinar D; Chow KY; Fock C J Med Screen; 2015 Dec; 22(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 26081449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the performance and impact of breast cancer screening programmes in East Anglia, U.K. and Bouches du Rhône, France. McCann J; Wait S; Séradour B; Day N Eur J Cancer; 1997 Mar; 33(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 9155528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK. Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between needle biopsy rates and cancer detection rates in the English NHS Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Blanks RG; Given-Wilson R; Alison R; Jenkins J; Wallis MG Clin Radiol; 2019 May; 74(5):384-389. PubMed ID: 30799096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does individual programme size affect screening performance? Results from the United Kingdom NHS breast screening programme. Blanks RG; Bennett RL; Wallis MG; Moss SM J Med Screen; 2002; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11943791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme. Blanks RG; Given-Wilson RM; Cohen SL; Patnick J; Alison RJ; Wallis MG Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3812-3819. PubMed ID: 30715589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening? Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results from the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme. Bulliard JL; De Landtsheer JP; Levi F Eur J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 39(12):1761-9. PubMed ID: 12888372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group. Lynge E APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]