These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8375557)

  • 1. Dose reduction in panoramic radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Faulkner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 8375557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Downes SL; Mokhtari M; Faulkner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The radiation burden in high resolution panoramic radiography. The fanned exposure pattern and integral absorbed dose in free focus radiography.
    Jensen TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1984; 13(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 6586592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection.
    Davis AT; Safi H; Maddison SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140223. PubMed ID: 25352427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorbed dose reduced by sliced exposure using sector selector system with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8620590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Absorbed dose and the effective dose of panoramic temporo mandibular joint radiography].
    Matsuo A; Okano T; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(10):1275-83. PubMed ID: 22026980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.
    Danforth RA; Clark DE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 10673663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
    Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The current status of panoramic radiography.
    Hirschmann PN
    Int Dent J; 1987 Mar; 37(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 3294598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between panoramic radiographic techniques. Part IV. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from the Orthopantomograph, model OP10.
    Stenström B; Julin P; Karlsson L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1987; 16(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 3472969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Panoramic radiography: digital technology fosters efficiency.
    Benson BW; Liang H; Flint DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32 Spec No 4():6-8. PubMed ID: 22195340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between panoramic radiographic techniques. Part III: Radiation absorbed doses with Status-X, Orthopantomograph Model OP5, and Paneléte.
    Stenstrom B; Julin P; Richter S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1982; 11(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 6962151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panoramic exposure techniques using an intraoral tube.
    Smits NJ; Cobben JJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1983; 12(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 6584362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.