168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8375822)
1. State model: Minnesota. The trip from acrimony to accommodation.
Leichter HM
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):48-58. PubMed ID: 8375822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. State models: an overview. Tracking states' efforts to reform their health systems.
Rogal DL; Helms WD
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 8375820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. State model: Washington. Managed competition and premium caps in Washington State.
Crittenden RA
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 8375827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care reform in Minnesota.
Miles SH; Lurie N; Quam L; Caplan A
N Engl J Med; 1992 Oct; 327(15):1092-5. PubMed ID: 1522847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. State model: Hawaii. A pioneer in health system reform.
Neubauer D
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):31-9. PubMed ID: 8375821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health care reform in Minnesota: lessons for the country.
Orbovich CB; Quam L
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1993; 70(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 8401460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State model: Maryland. A regulatory approach to health system reform.
Anderson G; Chaulk P; Fowler E
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):40-7. PubMed ID: 8166788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State model: Vermont. Health care reform in Vermont: a work in progress.
Leichter HM
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 8375826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. MnCare will likely face legal hurdles.
Lucke SP; Byram TJ
Minn Med; 1992 Nov; 75(11):33-5. PubMed ID: 1435647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Will program cuts exacerbate our problems?
Berglin L
Minn Med; 2004 Oct; 87(10):35-6. PubMed ID: 15559098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commissions, clubs, and consensus: Florida reorganizes for health reform.
Brown LD
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):7-26. PubMed ID: 8375825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State model: New Jersey. Long-term experience with all-payer state rate setting.
Volpp KG; Siegel B
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 8375823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Minnesota care: round 4.
Kiscaden S
Minn Med; 1995 Jan; 78(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 7877574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State model: Oregon. The ups and downs of Oregon's rationing plan.
Fox DM; Leichter HM
Health Aff (Millwood); 1993; 12(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 8375824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reform must be a shared responsibility.
Gamble GL
Minn Med; 1994 Apr; 77(4):37. PubMed ID: 8007910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MinnesotaCare (HealthRight). Myths and miracles.
Yawn BP; Jacott WE; Yawn RA
JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 8419672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Break the gridlock in Washington.
Crimmins TJ
Minn Med; 1996 Apr; 79(4):34. PubMed ID: 8637488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How Tennessee finances Medicaid.
Dixon R
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 1993; 4(3):233-7; discussion 238-41. PubMed ID: 8353215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Principles for forging a national health plan.
Enochs R; Cato A; Jillson-Boostrom I; Bonnyman G; Braithwaite R; Cebrun A; Kirkland-Essien JD; Evans T; Hardy R; Scott V
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 1993; 4(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 8353226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do we have to sacrifice access and quality to cut costs?
Bradley F
Minn Med; 2004 Oct; 87(10):35, 52. PubMed ID: 15559097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
