781 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8375870)
1. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
Boyle A; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
Wei XF; Grill WM
J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The contribution of the lungs to thoracic impedance measurements: a simulation study based on a high resolution finite difference model.
Yang F; Patterson RP
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S153-61. PubMed ID: 17664633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
Woo EJ; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive mesh refinement techniques for 3-D skin electrode modeling.
Sawicki B; Okoniewski M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 19789105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A finite element model to identify electrode influence on current distribution in the skin.
Sha N; Kenney LP; Heller BW; Barker AT; Howard D; Moatamedi M
Artif Organs; 2008 Aug; 32(8):639-43. PubMed ID: 18782136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images.
Adler A; Arnold JH; Bayford R; Borsic A; Brown B; Dixon P; Faes TJ; Frerichs I; Gagnon H; Gärber Y; Grychtol B; Hahn G; Lionheart WR; Malik A; Patterson RP; Stocks J; Tizzard A; Weiler N; Wolf GK
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S35-55. PubMed ID: 19491438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of electrode geometry and cell location on single-cell impedance measurement.
Wang JW; Wang MH; Jang LS
Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Feb; 25(6):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19926465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Simulation study of line electrode for electrical impedance tomography].
Wang Y; Sha H; Ren C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 18027681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography.
Rahal M; Khor JM; Demosthenous A; Tizzard A; Bayford R
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S73-84. PubMed ID: 19491443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
