These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8376218)

  • 1. Temporal integration and oscillatory responses of the human auditory cortex revealed by evoked magnetic fields to click trains.
    Forss N; Mäkelä JP; McEvoy L; Hari R
    Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 68(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 8376218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recovery and refractoriness of auditory evoked fields after gaps in click trains.
    Gutschalk A; Patterson RD; Uppenkamp S; Scherg M; Rupp A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 20(11):3141-7. PubMed ID: 15579168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRs). II: Addition of responses to individual stimuli.
    Santarelli R; Maurizi M; Conti G; Ottaviani F; Paludetti G; Pettorossi VE
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):9-18. PubMed ID: 7607994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Human Auditory Sensory Memory Trace Persists about 10 sec: Neuromagnetic Evidence.
    Sams M; Hari R; Rif J; Knuutila J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1993; 5(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 23972223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of chopper units in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised guinea pig to clicks-in-noise and click trains.
    Burkard R; Palmer AR
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):234-50. PubMed ID: 9282906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory cortical responses in humans with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss from early childhood.
    Vasama JP; Mäkelä JP
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):183-90. PubMed ID: 9119762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synchrony between single-unit activity and local field potentials in relation to periodicity coding in primary auditory cortex.
    Eggermont JJ; Smith GM
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Jan; 73(1):227-45. PubMed ID: 7714568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaural interaction in the human auditory cortex.
    Tiihonen J; Hari R; Kaukoranta E; Kajola M
    Audiology; 1989; 28(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 2923586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence of sharp frequency tuning in the human auditory cortex.
    Sams M; Salmelin R
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):67-74. PubMed ID: 8071155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Click train encoding in primary and non-primary auditory cortex of anesthetized macaque monkeys.
    Oshurkova E; Scheich H; Brosch M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 153(4):1289-99. PubMed ID: 18423884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory scene analysis and sensory memory: the role of the auditory N100m.
    May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():19. PubMed ID: 16015713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cumulative effect of high click rate on monaural and binaural processing in the human auditory brainstem.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 114(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 12559246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of interstimulus intervals and between-block rests on the auditory evoked potential and magnetic field: is the auditory P50 in humans an overlapping potential?
    Onitsuka T; Ninomiya H; Sato E; Yamamoto T; Tashiro N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Feb; 111(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 10680558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory magnetic response to clicks in children and adults: its components, hemispheric lateralization and repetition suppression effect.
    Orekhova EV; Butorina AV; Tsetlin MM; Novikova SI; Sokolov PA; Elam M; Stroganova TA
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):410-27. PubMed ID: 23104186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralization: II. Interaural time differences at sound onset.
    McEvoy L; Hari R; Imada T; Sams M
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):98-109. PubMed ID: 8340283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nicotine Enhances Amplitude and Consistency of Timing of Responses to Acoustic Trains in A1.
    Intskirveli I; Metherate R
    Front Neural Circuits; 2021; 15():597401. PubMed ID: 33679335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contra- and ipsilateral auditory stimuli produce different activation patterns at the human auditory cortex. A neuromagnetic study.
    Mäkelä JP
    Pflugers Arch; 1988 Jul; 412(1-2):12-6. PubMed ID: 3174374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.