These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8376423)

  • 1. Survival analysis of joint replacements.
    Murray DW; Carr AJ; Bulstrode C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1993 Sep; 75(5):697-704. PubMed ID: 8376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total hip and knee replacements.
    Goldie I
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1991; 241():23-6. PubMed ID: 1901683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in surgical loads and economic burden of hip and knee replacements in the US: 1997-2004.
    Kim S
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Apr; 59(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 18383407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Results of a management plan for surgical waiting lists for hip and knee replacements].
    Martí-Valls J; Ballesta E; González R; Solé M; Torras G
    Gac Sanit; 2006; 20(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 16756865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total hip and knee replacements: a survey of 261 hospitals in England.
    Newman KJ
    J R Soc Med; 1993 Sep; 86(9):527-9. PubMed ID: 8410891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is kinematic total knee replacement better than total hip replacement?
    Ewald FC; Hsu HP; Walker PS
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1989 Jan; 20(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 2919082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stanmore total hip replacement in younger patients: review of a group of patients under 50 years of age at operation.
    Emery DF; Clarke HJ; Grover ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Mar; 79(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 9119850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Endoprosthesis surgery of hip and knee, spare parts improve mobility].
    Lehto MU; Jämsen E; Rissanen P
    Duodecim; 2005; 121(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15931836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The burden of waiting for hip and knee replacements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team.
    Williams JI; Llewellyn Thomas H; Arshinoff R; Young N; Naylor CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Feb; 3(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 9238608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Endoprostheses in Finland].
    Paavolainen P
    Duodecim; 1991; 107(7):476-7. PubMed ID: 1364896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).
    Havelin LI; Robertsson O; Fenstad AM; Overgaard S; Garellick G; Furnes O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():13-9. PubMed ID: 22262418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appropriateness of primary total hip and knee replacements in regions of Ontario with high and low utilization rates.
    van Walraven CV; Paterson JM; Kapral M; Chan B; Bell M; Hawker G; Gollish J; Schatzker J; Williams JI; Naylor CD
    CMAJ; 1996 Sep; 155(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 8823215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants.
    Nelissen RG; Pijls BG; Kärrholm J; Malchau H; Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():62-5. PubMed ID: 22262426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.
    Clark R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Sep; 75(9):1417. PubMed ID: 8408161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can a total knee replacement prosthesis be made entirely of polymers?
    Moore DJ; Freeman MA; Revell PA; Bradley GW; Tuke M
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 9645518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements.
    Abdel MP; Morrey ME; Jensen MR; Morrey BF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Nov; 93(22):2072-8. PubMed ID: 22262378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survivorship analysis and confidence intervals. An assessment with reference to the Stanmore total knee replacement.
    Lettin AW; Ware HS; Morris RW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Sep; 73(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 1894659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loss to follow-up matters.
    Murray DW; Britton AR; Bulstrode CJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Mar; 79(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 9119852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.
    Furnes O; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 89(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17332100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survivorship analysis of the Kinematic Stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up.
    Emmerson KP; Moran CG; Pinder IM
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 8636183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.