BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8377047)

  • 1. Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures.
    Horn BD; Rettig ME
    J Orthop Trauma; 1993; 7(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 8377047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons.
    Brumback RJ; Jones AL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Aug; 76(8):1162-6. PubMed ID: 8056796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An interobserver reliability comparison between the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's open fracture classification and the Gustilo and Anderson classification.
    Ghoshal A; Enninghorst N; Sisak K; Balogh ZJ
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Feb; 100-B(2):242-246. PubMed ID: 29437068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The OTA open fracture classification: a study of reliability and agreement.
    Agel J; Evans AR; Marsh JL; Decoster TA; Lundy DW; Kellam JF; Jones CB; Desilva GL
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jul; 27(7):379-84; discussion 384-5. PubMed ID: 23287764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unified classification of open fractures: Based on Gustilo and OTA classification schemes.
    Agrawal A
    Injury; 2018 Aug; 49(8):1526-1531. PubMed ID: 29895437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver Reliability of 2 Classification Systems for Open Hand Fractures.
    Warrender WJ; Lucasti CJ; Ilyas A
    Hand (N Y); 2021 Jan; 16(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 30947561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the OTA Open Fracture Classification Align With the Gustilo-Anderson Classification? A Study of 2215 Open Fractures.
    Kovvur M; Turner KE; Lawrence JE; O'Toole RV; O'Hara NN; Slobogean GP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2024 Feb; 38(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 38031292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
    Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
    Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distal clavicle fractures: A new classification system.
    Cho CH; Kim BS; Kim DH; Choi CH; Dan J; Lee H
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1231-1235. PubMed ID: 30393071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Dias-Tachdjian classification in pediatric ankle fractures: do clinical experience and expertise matter?
    Demirel M; Yenigün MY; Mert L; Kendirci AŞ; Yağci TF; Demir TB; Sağlam Y; Cirdi Y; Yağdiran B; Korkmazer B
    J Pediatr Orthop B; 2024 May; 33(3):240-245. PubMed ID: 37266919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and reproducibility of dens fracture classification with use of plain radiography and reformatted computer-aided tomography.
    Barker L; Anderson J; Chesnut R; Nesbit G; Tjauw T; Hart R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jan; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 16391255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Evolution and Interpretation of the Gustilo and Anderson Classification.
    Yim GH; Hardwicke JT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Dec; 100(24):e152. PubMed ID: 30562299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Two Factors on Interobserver Reliability for Proximal Humeral Fractures.
    Mellema JJ; Kuntz MT; Guitton TG; Ring D
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2017 Jan; 25(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 27906770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of distal third clavicle fractures.
    Bishop JY; Jones GL; Lewis B; Pedroza A;
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Apr; 43(4):979-84. PubMed ID: 25587184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
    Dai LY; Jin WJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 15682019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.
    Jones GL; Bishop JY; Lewis B; Pedroza AD;
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 May; 42(5):1176-81. PubMed ID: 24573571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model.
    Dirschl DR; Adams GL
    J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):471-6. PubMed ID: 9334947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons.
    Gustilo RB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Aug; 77(8):1291-2. PubMed ID: 7642678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.