BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8377985)

  • 1. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.
    Tate KM; Strickland JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V; Tseng P
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
    Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
    Rochelson B; Krumholz BA
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
    Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?
    Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
    el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
    Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Andersen W; Frierson H; Barber S; Tabbarah S; Taylor P; Underwood P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 3048105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Necessity for endocervical curettage in elderly women undergoing colposcopy.
    Dinh TA; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Dillard EA
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):621-4. PubMed ID: 2810244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
    Moniak CW; Kutzner S; Adam E; Harden J; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Apr; 45(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 10804483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.