These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8379859)

  • 1. The Hay's flexion rotation obstetric forceps: reestablishing relevance in modern obstetrics.
    Sheriar NK; Mataliya MV; Daftary SN
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 19(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 8379859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery.
    Bashore RA; Phillips WH; Brinkman CR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1428-34; discussion 1434-5. PubMed ID: 2360575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified manual rotation in midpelvic delivery.
    Goodlin RC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jan; 67(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 3940326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal and maternal outcome in low-pelvic and midpelvic operative deliveries.
    Robertson PA; Laros RK; Zhao RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1436-42; discussion 1442-4. PubMed ID: 2360576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
    Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496.
    Ramphul M; Kennelly MM; Burke G; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 25414081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.
    Al-Suhel R; Gill S; Robson S; Shadbolt B
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 19780735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of obstetric forceps training in North America in 1981.
    Healy DL; Laufe LE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 151(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 3966505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?
    Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The midforceps: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Dierker LJ; Rosen MG; Thompson K; Debanne S; Linn P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 152(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 4003466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice.
    Burke N; Field K; Mujahid F; Morrison JJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):766-70. PubMed ID: 22996093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery.
    Stock SJ; Josephs K; Farquharson S; Love C; Cooper SE; Kissack C; Akolekar R; Norman JE; Denison FC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 121(5):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 23635740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Management of persistent posterior occipital presentation. 253 extractions by forceps].
    Palaric JC; Bourgeois-Dujols P; Jacquemard F; Poulain P; Grall JY; Giraud JR
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 1955670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of midforceps, low-forceps, and spontaneous vaginal deliveries.
    Tedesco JH
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1989 Apr; 89(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 2737931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.