These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8380653)

  • 41. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. NIH report vindicates Gallo on conduct of AIDS research.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):3-4. PubMed ID: 1315421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Misconduct and the development of ethics in the biological sciences.
    Reiser SJ
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 7858748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct.
    Rasmussen LM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Jun; 20(2):411-21. PubMed ID: 24002821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dr Baltimore says "sorry".
    Baltimore D
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):94-5. PubMed ID: 2030740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
    Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Gallo inquiry takes puzzling new turn.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Oct; 250(4978):202-3. PubMed ID: 2218520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
    Pascal CB
    Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Baltimore throws in the towel.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 May; 252(5007):768, 770. PubMed ID: 1851328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The strains of the HIV war.
    Brown P
    New Sci; 1991 May; 130(1770):20-1. PubMed ID: 11656059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Science friction.
    Gladwell M
    Washington Post; 1992 Dec; ():18-21, 49-51. PubMed ID: 11646256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Gallo probe. The Richards panel tosses a curve.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1992 Apr; 256(5053):23. PubMed ID: 1566052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.