These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8380653)

  • 61. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside.
    Youngner JS
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 9424047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Gallo investigation raises new questions.
    Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5031):507. PubMed ID: 1948019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. ORI's self-assessment: a batting average of .920?
    Friedly J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5304):1255. PubMed ID: 9064778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Star chambers will result in injustice.
    Kevles DJ
    Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6700):317. PubMed ID: 11645104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Scientific misconduct. Baylor saga comes to an end.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5405):1091. PubMed ID: 10075561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The fraud case that evaporated.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
    Rennie D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Army clears Redfield--but fails to resolve controversy.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Aug; 261(5123):824-5. PubMed ID: 8346432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Misconduct charges against Gallo withdrawn after Popovic decision.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6452):191. PubMed ID: 8232569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.