These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8380877)

  • 21. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
    Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Star chambers will result in injustice.
    Kevles DJ
    Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6700):317. PubMed ID: 11645104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ORI and misconduct investigations.
    Bivens LW
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 'Verdicts' are in on the Gallo probe.
    Palca J
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5058):735-8. PubMed ID: 1589751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5241):1431. PubMed ID: 7491482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.