450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8383657)
1. A randomized multicenter trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Swedish Study Group.
Eklund AE; Nord CE
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Jan; 31 Suppl A():79-85. PubMed ID: 8383657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Brismar B; Malmborg AS; Tunevall G; Wretlind B; Bergman L; Mentzing LO; Nyström PO; Kihlström E; Bäckstrand B; Skau T
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1992 Dec; 36(12):2766-73. PubMed ID: 1336347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Niinikoski J; Havia T; Alhava E; Pääkkönen M; Miettinen P; Kivilaakso E; Haapiainen R; Matikainen M; Laitinen S
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Mar; 176(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 8382381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infection.
Erasmo AA; Crisostomo AC; Yan LN; Hong YS; Lee KU; Lo CM
Asian J Surg; 2004 Jul; 27(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 15564167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin for severe diabetic foot infections: a prospective, randomized clinical trial in a university hospital.
Saltoglu N; Dalkiran A; Tetiker T; Bayram H; Tasova Y; Dalay C; Sert M
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Aug; 16(8):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19832720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.
Dietrich ES; Schubert B; Ebner W; Daschner F
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001 Jan; 19(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11252548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Piperacillin 2 g/tazobactam 0.5 g is as effective as imipenem 0.5 g/cilastatin 0.5 g for the treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infections.
Naber KG; Savov O; Salmen HC
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2002 Feb; 19(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 11850161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections: the role of piperacillin/tazobactam.
Nord CE
Intensive Care Med; 1994 Jul; 20 Suppl 3():S35-8. PubMed ID: 7962987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.
Jaccard C; Troillet N; Harbarth S; Zanetti G; Aymon D; Schneider R; Chiolero R; Ricou B; Romand J; Huber O; Ambrosetti P; Praz G; Lew D; Bille J; Glauser MP; Cometta A
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1998 Nov; 42(11):2966-72. PubMed ID: 9797234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imipenem-cilastatin versus piperacillin-tazobactam as monotherapy in febrile neutropenia.
Vural S; Erdem E; Gulec SG; Yildirmak Y; Kebudi R
Pediatr Int; 2010 Apr; 52(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 19744230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.
Eur J Surg Suppl; 1994; (573):61-6. PubMed ID: 7524798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety profile of piperacillin/tazobactam in phase I and III clinical studies.
Kuye O; Teal J; DeVries VG; Morrow CA; Tally FP
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Jan; 31 Suppl A():113-24. PubMed ID: 8383652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Brismar B; Malmborg AS; Tunevall G; Lindgren V; Bergman L; Mentzing LO; Nyström PO; Anséhn S; Bäckstrand B; Skau T
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1995 Jan; 35(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 7768761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for treatment of mixed anaerobic complicated intra-abdominal, complicated skin and skin structure, and acute pelvic infections.
Tellado J; Woods GL; Gesser R; McCarroll K; Teppler H
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 12697078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.
Brismar B; Akerlund JE; Sjöstedt S; Johansson C; Törnqvist A; Bäckstrand B; Bång H; Andåker L; Gustafsson PO; Darle N; Angerås M; Falk A; Tunevall G; Kasholm-Tengve B; Skau T; Nyström PO; Gasslander T; Hagelbäck A; Olsson-Liljequist B; Eklund AE; Nord CE
Scand J Infect Dis; 1996; 28(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 8953683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in febrile neutropenia (1994-1996)].
Figuera A ; Rivero N; Pajuelo F; Font P; Leyra F; de La Cámara R; Arranz R; María Fernández Rañada J
Med Clin (Barc); 2001 May; 116(16):610-1. PubMed ID: 11412645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Co-administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with increased renal dysfunction in adult and pediatric burn patients.
Hundeshagen G; Herndon DN; Capek KD; Branski LK; Voigt CD; Killion EA; Cambiaso-Daniel J; Sljivich M; De Crescenzo A; Mlcak RP; Kinsky MP; Finnerty CC; Norbury WB
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):318. PubMed ID: 29262848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem: a double-blind, randomized formulary feasibility study at a major teaching hospital.
Marra F; Reynolds R; Stiver G; Bryce E; Sleigh K; Frighetto L; MacDougall C; Jewesson P
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(2):355-68. PubMed ID: 9635910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacoeconomics of piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.
Jhee SS; Gill MA; Yellin AE; Berne TV; Heseltine PN; Appleman MD
Clin Ther; 1995; 17(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 7758055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imipenem/cilastatin versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients: results of the COSTINE study.
Sanz MA; Bermúdez A; Rovira M; Besalduch J; Pascual MJ; Nocea G; Sanz-Rodríguez C;
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):645-55. PubMed ID: 15969864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
