These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8384287)

  • 1. Energy loss of 70 MeV protons in organic polymers.
    Hiraoka T; Kawashima K; Hoshino K; Fukumura A; Bichsel H
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 8384287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for the lateral penumbra in water of a 200-MeV proton beam devoted to clinical applications.
    Oozeer R; Mazal A; Rosenwald JC; Belshi R; Nauraye C; Ferrand R; Biensan S
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1599-604. PubMed ID: 9350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Charged photoparticle production in tissue during radiotherapy.
    Allen PD; Chaudhri MA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):837-9. PubMed ID: 9198016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of stopping power ratios for 60 MeV positive or negative pions.
    Nordin JA; Henkelman RM
    Phys Med Biol; 1979 Jul; 24(4):781-92. PubMed ID: 112597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LET dependence of GafChromic films and an ion chamber in low-energy proton dosimetry.
    Kirby D; Green S; Palmans H; Hugtenburg R; Wojnecki C; Parker D
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):417-33. PubMed ID: 20019399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reassessment of stopping power ratio uncertainties caused by mean excitation energies using a water-based formalism.
    De Smet V; Labarbe R; Vander Stappen F; Macq B; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3361-3370. PubMed ID: 29729022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microdosimetry spectra of the Loma Linda proton beam and relative biological effectiveness comparisons.
    Coutrakon G; Cortese J; Ghebremedhin A; Hubbard J; Johanning J; Koss P; Maudsley G; Slater CR; Zuccarelli C
    Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1499-506. PubMed ID: 9304579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scattered neutron dose equivalent from an active scanning proton beam delivery system.
    Hecksel D; Sandison GA; Farr JB; Edwards AC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2007 Dec; 30(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 18274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alanine dosimetry of proton therapy beams.
    Onori S; d'Errico F; De Angelis C; Egger E; Fattibene P; Janovsky I
    Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 9089596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiobiological significance of beamline dependent proton energy distributions in a spread-out Bragg peak.
    Paganetti H; Goitein M
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1119-26. PubMed ID: 10841418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of inelastic hadronic processes for 250 MeV proton interactions in tissue and iron using GEANT4.
    Chen Y; Ahmad S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Aug; 136(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19689963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective atomic numbers of composite materials for total and partial interaction processes for photons, electrons, and protons.
    Prasad SG; Parthasaradhi K; Bloomer WD
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):883-5. PubMed ID: 9198023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A consistent set of neutron kerma coefficients from thermal to 150 MeV for biologically important materials.
    Chadwick MB; Barschall HH; Caswell RS; DeLuca PM; Hale GM; Jones DT; MacFarlane RE; Meulders JP; Schuhmacher H; Schrewe UJ; Wambersie A; Young PG
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):974-91. PubMed ID: 10436900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter.
    Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LiF TLD-100 as a dosimeter in high energy proton beam therapy--can it yield accurate results?
    Zullo JR; Kudchadker RJ; Zhu XR; Sahoo N; Gillin MT
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 19931017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculated Bragg curves for ionization chambers of different shapes.
    Bichsel H
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1721-6. PubMed ID: 8587524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A correction method for diamond detector signal dependence with proton energy.
    Fidanzio A; Azario L; De Angelis C; Pacilio M; Onori S; Kacperek A; Piermattei A
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 12033561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo simulation and analysis of proton energy-deposition patterns in the Bragg peak.
    González-Muñoz G; Tilly N; Fernández-Varea JM; Ahnesjö A
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2857-75. PubMed ID: 18460751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.