224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 838429)
1. [Legal aspects concerning the physician and expert testimony. Latest legal decisions: limits of informed consent].
Friederichs VH
Fortschr Med; 1977 Jan; 95(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 838429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Deafness after previous stapes repair].
Wienke A
Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Jul; 71(7):376-7. PubMed ID: 1497773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The legal position of the obstetrician in relation to the pregnant patient, the father and the child as well as the expert witness].
Hiersche HD; Hiersche F
Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 2696704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient.
Rauzi E
Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The medico-legal situation of informed consent problems in ear operations. A civil law decision of the German Federal Court].
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jun; 57(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 661468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
Penhallegon JR
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed.
Kessenick LW; Mankin PA
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent liability.
Recher BC
Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent.
Horan DJ; Halligan P
Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Current gastroenterology - legal problems].
Weissauer W
Internist (Berl); 1982 May; 23(5):suppl 25-8. PubMed ID: 7047443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act.
Rosen MW
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas.
Dalrymple G
St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The requirements of informed consent.
Goldie RR
Hospitals; 1972 May; 46(10):58-61 passim. PubMed ID: 5024746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Patient education from the legal viewpoint].
Schreiber HL
Internist (Berl); 1983 Apr; 24(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6345433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness.
Kopis WF
St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Legal questions from the physician's practice].
Hiller C; Hiersche HD
Gynakologe; 1982 Jun; 15(2):52-61. PubMed ID: 7117909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal issues in dermatology: informed consent, complications and medical malpractice.
Goldberg DJ
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2007 Mar; 26(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17349556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
