224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 838429)
41. [Forensic medicine topics in pathology. I. On the legal status of clinical autopsy].
Eisenmenger W; Betz P; Penning R
Pathologe; 1991 May; 12(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 1876581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The decline of "informed consent".
Plant ML
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Recent decisions on informed consent.
Simonaitis JE
JAMA; 1972 Jul; 221(4):441-2. PubMed ID: 5067861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [The patient education document].
Laufs A
Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):364-8. PubMed ID: 2696701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Current views on the medico-legal situation].
Becker W
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Apr; 57(4):363-6. PubMed ID: 651484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [The physician as the expert in civil legal suits].
Weimar W
Ther Ggw; 1981 Aug; 120(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 7292360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Behavior following an incident. What can, what should, what must be done from the legal viewpoint?].
Ulsenheimer K; Bock RW
Chirurg; 1996 May; 67(5):suppl 110-4. PubMed ID: 8777875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Remarks of a lawyer on medical expertise].
Kohnle E
Fortschr Med; 1981 Nov; 99(44):1823-5. PubMed ID: 7308945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Confidentiality--possibilities and limits].
Rüping H
Internist (Berl); 1983 Apr; 24(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 6345437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Problems in expert testimony and court decisions in malpractice cases following paragraph 8 section 1 and 2 of the German Penal Code].
Bergner R
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1976 Aug; 70(15):856-9. PubMed ID: 983157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Oh, didn't I tell you? A look at informed consent.
Greenwald AE
Trial; 1982 Jun; 18(6):54-56, 85. PubMed ID: 11658483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Written consent pror to medical treatment?].
Weissauer W
Chirurg; 1972 Jun; 43(6):Suppl 6:37-44. PubMed ID: 5047773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments.
Murphy WJ
Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Carney v Newton: expert evidence about the standard of clinical notes.
Faunce T; Hammer I; Jefferys S
J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):360-5. PubMed ID: 18251420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dental implant jurisprudence: avoiding the legal failures.
Curley AW
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2002; 81(3):29-34. PubMed ID: 12415918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
Cyran W
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [On the requisition of medical records].
Kohlhaas M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1968 Oct; 93(42):2027-9. PubMed ID: 5678871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Effect of criminal justice on civil rights apprehension].
Deutsch E
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Oct; 92(8-9):634-8. PubMed ID: 9885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [The medical expert and his standards].
Bach HG
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1983 Jun; 43 Suppl 1():77-81. PubMed ID: 6555137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects.
Alsobrook HB
Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
