91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8384542)
21. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.
Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitization to Rubber Accelerators in Northeastern Italy: The Triveneto Patch Test Database.
Buttazzo S; Prodi A; Fortina AB; Corradin MT; Larese Filon F
Dermatitis; 2016; 27(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 27331339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A draining lymph node assay (DLNA) for assessing the sensitizing potential of proteins.
Boverhof DR; Gollapudi BB; Hotchkiss JA; Osterloh-Quiroz M; Woolhiser MR
Toxicol Lett; 2010 Mar; 193(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 20060446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site.
Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD
Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Appraisal of the sensitising potential of orally and dermally administered mercaptobenzothiazole by a biphasic protocol of the local lymph node assay.
Ahuja V; Wanner R; Platzek T; Stahlmann R
Arch Toxicol; 2009 Oct; 83(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 19381614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proliferative responses in the local lymph node assay associated with concomitant exposure to 1,4-phenylenediamine and methyldibromo glutaronitrile: evidence for synergy?
Jowsey IR; Basketter DA; Irwin A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Aug; 59(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18759875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Drug interactions with potential rubber closure extractables. Identification of thiol-disulfide exchange reaction products of captopril and thiurams.
Corredor C; Tomasella FP; Young J
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jan; 1216(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19041978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of patch testing in patients and chemical analysis. Application to cases from rubber footwear.
Kaniwa MA; Isama K; Nakamura A; Kantoh H; Itoh M; Miyoshi K; Saito S; Shono M
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Jan; 30(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 8156759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison.
Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR
J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Occupational contact sensitization in female geriatric nurses: Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2005-2014.
Schubert S; Bauer A; Molin S; Skudlik C; Geier J
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Mar; 31(3):469-476. PubMed ID: 27518760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oxidative hemoglobin breakdown induced by a rubber additive.
Williamson D; Winterbourn CC; Swallow WH; Missen AW
Hemoglobin; 1981; 5(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 7204095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Further development of LLNA:DAE method as stand-alone skin-sensitization testing method and applied for evaluation of relative skin-sensitizing potency between chemicals.
Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Apr; 40(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 25786520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Environmental and biological determination of N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylendiamine (IPPD) in a rubber vulcanization shop].
Scansetti G; Buglione E; Massiccio MM; Greghi D; Botta GC; Pavan I; Belliardo F; Pira E
Med Lav; 1983; 74(6):464-74. PubMed ID: 6674716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsukamoto Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 8222623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
