These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8389388)

  • 1. Should teeth be built up for crowns?
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1993 Jun; 124(6):93-4. PubMed ID: 8389388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct core materials.
    Wilson PH; Fisher NL; Bartlett DW
    Dent Update; 2003 Sep; 30(7):362-8. PubMed ID: 14558201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: cores for teeth with vital pulps.
    Wassell RW; Smart ER; St George G
    Br Dent J; 2002 May; 192(9):499-502, 505-9. PubMed ID: 12047122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Amalgam. XI. Glass-ionomer as a possible substitute of amalgam: longevity].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Jan; 101(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11830988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resistance of composite and amalgam core foundations retained with and without pins and bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Swigert R; Richman B; Sawicki V; Pace L; Moon PC
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):130-7; quiz 138-9. PubMed ID: 20236921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct cores for vital teeth--materials and methods used to retain cores in vital teeth.
    Wilson PH; Fisher NL; Bartlett DW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 12526272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Achieving optimum retention for restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Aug; 135(8):1143-5. PubMed ID: 15387053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Amalgam. X. Glass-ionomer cement: a biocompatible substitute for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Nov; 100(11):484-8. PubMed ID: 11822129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental anomalies--are adhesive castings the solution?
    Harley KE; Ibbetson RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Jan; 174(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8417771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth.
    Brandal JL; Nicholls JI; Harrington GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 3305881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups.
    Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Glass-ionomer cements as base material and dental bonding].
    Blok C
    Tandlaegebladet; 1992 Mar; 96(5):206-14. PubMed ID: 1412038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.
    Tsiagali V; Kirmanidou Y; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e229-e236. PubMed ID: 29143388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternatives to amalgam.
    Lyons K
    N Z Dent J; 1997 Jun; 93(412):47-50. PubMed ID: 9293745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guideline on Restorative Dentistry.
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Oct; 38(5):107-119. PubMed ID: 28206887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Achieving optimum retention for restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2005; 84(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 16190024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE; Martin W; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Restoration of badly-broken down and endodontically treated teeth].
    Tanbirojn D; Sukonthaman L
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(5):226-33. PubMed ID: 2130077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.