These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8389507)
1. Prevention of cervical cancer by screening. Philip J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1993 May; 72(4):236-7. PubMed ID: 8389507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme. Coleman D; Day N; Douglas G; Farmery E; Lynge E; Philip J; Segnan N Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A Suppl 4():S1-38. PubMed ID: 8274301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Rasaiah B CMAJ; 1992 Apr; 146(8):1279-80; author reply 1280, 1284-5. PubMed ID: 1622496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Anderson GH CMAJ; 1992 Apr; 146(8):1280; author reply 1280, 1284-5. PubMed ID: 1555154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"]. Calvache AE Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening. Renshaw AA Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer prevention for all Canadians. Sellors JW Can Fam Physician; 1999 Feb; 45():245-7, 252-4. PubMed ID: 10065291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average]. van Rijswijk A Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix. Miller AB; Anderson G; Brisson J; Laidlaw J; Le Pitre N; Malcolmson P; Mirwaldt P; Stuart G; Sullivan W CMAJ; 1991 Nov; 145(10):1301-25. PubMed ID: 1933712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'. Slater DN Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Pap smear: a victim of its own success? Steigman CK; Vernick JP MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):8-14; quiz 14-5. PubMed ID: 12228932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective. Steiner C Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 2750437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [European guidelines for quality assurance in the screening for cancer of the uterine cervix]. Lynge E; Philip J Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Mar; 156(11):1654. PubMed ID: 8009664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]