BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8390947)

  • 1. Is mammographic microcalcification of biological significance?
    Holme TC; Reis MM; Thompson A; Robertson A; Parham D; Hickman P; Preece PE
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1993 Jun; 19(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 8390947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic and pathologic correlation of microcalcification in disease of the breast.
    Colbassani HJ; Feller WF; Cigtay OS; Chun B
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Nov; 155(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 6291181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Assessment of non-palpable mammographic changes of the breast].
    Diergarten K; Kessler U; Eiermann W
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 245(1-4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2552940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
    Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumour characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer.
    Ferranti C; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Biganzoli E; Bergonzi S; Mariani L; Scaperrotta G; Marchesini M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):698-705. PubMed ID: 11089459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Holland R; Hendriks JH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Detection of cancer of the breast].
    Warren-Burhenne LJ
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1980; 45(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 6099899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy.
    O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Diagnostic significance of calcifications in the mammogram].
    Menges V
    Z Lymphol; 1981 Jul; 5(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 6270925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
    Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
    Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
    Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The intraductal components and microinvasive foci in ductal breast carcinoma on the mammogram].
    Lanyi M; Stiens R; Stiletto M
    Rofo; 1994 Sep; 161(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 7919243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Mammographic appearance and pathological correlation.
    Feig SA; Shaber GS; Patchefsky AS; Schwartz GF; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 212776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why is microcalcification missed on mammography?
    Peters G; Jones CM; Daniels K
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Feb; 57(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 23374551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Roentgen symptoms of early cancer of the breast].
    Kopp W; Fotter R; Schneider G
    Radiologe; 1986 Oct; 26(10):498-502. PubMed ID: 3024205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy in estimating tumor extension according to mammographic subtypes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Sato M; Fukutomi T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Miyakawa K; Yamamoto N; Hasegawa T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 May; 32(5):157-61. PubMed ID: 12110641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calcifications in metastatic breast carcinoma in axillary lymph nodes.
    Helvie MA; Rebner M; Sickles EA; Oberman HA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Nov; 151(5):921-2. PubMed ID: 2845762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications: prediction of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer.
    Cen D; Xu L; Zhang S; Zhou S; Huang Y; Chen Z; Li N; Wang Y; Wang Q
    Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(18):30190-30198. PubMed ID: 28415815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.