These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 839285)

  • 1. Review of four new indices of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Occup Med; 1977 Feb; 19(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 839285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychoacoustic correlates of susceptibility to auditory fatigue.
    Mustain WD; Schoeny ZG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7372023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General auditory effects of noise.
    Ward WD
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):473-92. PubMed ID: 471497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory-evoked potential correlates of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Attias J; Pratt H
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3994592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of noise-induced subclinical hearing loss using auditory brainstem responses and objective measures of noise exposure in humans.
    Skoe E; Tufts J
    Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 361():80-91. PubMed ID: 29370962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
    Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
    Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left-right asymmetry in the human response to experimental noise exposure. II. Pre-exposure hearing threshold and temporary threshold shift at 4 kHz frequency.
    Pirilä T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1991; 111(5):861-6. PubMed ID: 1759571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does lithotripsy cause hearing loss?
    Dawson C; Chilcott-Jones A; Corry DA; Cohen NP; Williams HO; Nockler IB; Whitfield HN
    Br J Urol; 1994 Feb; 73(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8131013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of industrial noise of higher spectrum on the workers’ auditory perception abilities.
    Mihailović D; Đurić N; Kovačević I; Mihailović Đ
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(11):1030-7. PubMed ID: 29328642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of high level sound exposure on the loudness difference limen.
    Bienvenue GR; Michael PL; Violon-Singer JR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Nov; 37(11):628-35. PubMed ID: 998497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Threshold of octave masking as a predictor of temporary threshold shift following repeated noise exposure.
    Chermak GD; Dengerink JE; Dengerink HA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 6748625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift.
    Nordmann AS; Bohne BA; Harding GW
    Hear Res; 2000 Jan; 139(1-2):13-30. PubMed ID: 10601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of an age-related hearing loss gene (Ahl) on noise-induced hearing loss and cochlear damage from low-frequency noise.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA; Vos JD
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15925194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.