These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 839285)

  • 41. Permanent effects of noise exposure on results of a battery of hearing tests.
    Bienvenue GR; Michael PL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 41(8):535-41. PubMed ID: 7405820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Speech discrimination in prescence of noise in different kinds of hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Hahn R
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 4410930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The threshold of octave masking (TOM) test as a predictor of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Humes LE; Schwartz DM; Bess FH
    J Aud Res; 1977 Jan; 17(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 614339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
    Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Smoorenburg GF; de Laat JA; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():123-33. PubMed ID: 6962506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cochlear dysfunction in "normal-hearing" patients with history of noise exposure.
    Alvord LS
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 6628849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():38-46. PubMed ID: 2356737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A procedure for the early detection of noise-susceptible individuals.
    Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Jan; 37(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1246949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A review of the history, development and application of auditory weighting functions in humans and marine mammals.
    Houser DS; Yost W; Burkard R; Finneran JJ; Reichmuth C; Mulsow J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1371. PubMed ID: 28372133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Possibilities of improving the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing damage by means of directional audiometry, the dichotic speech discrimination test, and the EEG1.
    Dieroff HG
    Audiology; 1976; 15(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 1252196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech perception in tinnitus is related to individual distress level - A neurophysiological study.
    Jagoda L; Giroud N; Neff P; Kegel A; Kleinjung T; Meyer M
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():48-58. PubMed ID: 30031353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Progressive noise induced hearing loss caused by hearing AIDS, a dilemma for the worker and the expert alike].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Dec; 80(12):740-2. PubMed ID: 11793272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
    Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Safety limit warning levels for the avoidance of excessive sound amplification to protect against further hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):829-836. PubMed ID: 28687060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pure-tone acuity, speech-hearing ability and deafness in acoustic trauma. A review of the literature.
    Noble WG
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):291-315. PubMed ID: 4578850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.