BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8393310)

  • 1. Breast biopsy for nonpalpable lesions: a worthwhile endeavor?
    Opie H; Estes NC; Jewell WR; Chang CH; Thomas JA; Estes MA
    Am Surg; 1993 Aug; 59(8):490-3; discussion 493-4. PubMed ID: 8393310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic wire localization in diagnosis and treatment of occult carcinoma of breast.
    Petrovich JA; Ross DS; Sullivan JW; Lake TP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 2537536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
    Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Holland R; Hendriks JH; van der Sluis RF; Lubbers EJ; de Boer HH
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 2825366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The significance of microcalcifications without palpable mass in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Lubbers EJ; van der Sluis RF; de Boer HH
    Surgery; 1986 Jun; 99(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 3012811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic wire-guided biopsies in non-palpable breast lesions.
    Adler OB; Engel A
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 May; 9(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 2545445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biopsy for microcalcification detected by mammography.
    Roses DF; Harris MN; Gorstein F; Gumport SL
    Surgery; 1980 Mar; 87(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 6244682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of the results of mammographically guided biopsies of the breast.
    McCreery BR; Frankl G; Frost DB
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 172(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 1847244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [X-ray morphologic characteristics of microcalcination in benign processes and cancer of the breast].
    Zolotarevskiĭ VB; Zal'tsman IN; Kulakova AM
    Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 2546321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
    Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
    Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Needle-localized breast biopsy for mammographic abnormalities: a community hospital experience.
    Tran DQ; Wilkerson DK; Namm J; Zeis MA; Cottone FJ
    Am Surg; 1999 Mar; 65(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 10075310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risk of carcinoma in wire localization biopsies for mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
    Roses DF; Mitnick J; Harris MN; Kaplon R; Karp N; Vazquez M; Dubin N
    Surgery; 1991 Nov; 110(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 1658957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast biopsy for calcifications in nonpalpable breast lesions. A prospective study.
    Franceschi D; Crowe J; Zollinger R; Duchesneau R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM
    Arch Surg; 1990 Feb; 125(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 2154171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of mammographic indeterminate lesions. First place winner of the Conrad Jobst Award in the Gold Medal paper competition.
    Hamby LS; McGrath PC; Stelling CB; Baker KF; Sloan DA; Kenady DE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonpalpable breast cancer: a mammographic-histological correlation.
    Egense M; Brünner S; Hansen H; Jacobsen GK; Laursen N
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():116-21. PubMed ID: 2173081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications.
    Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Papatestas A; Hermann DG; Rabinowitz JG
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 2845470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proliferative disease and atypia in biopsies performed for nonpalpable lesions detected mammographically.
    Rubin E; Visscher DW; Alexander RW; Urist MM; Maddox WA
    Cancer; 1988 May; 61(10):2077-82. PubMed ID: 3359405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.