These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8395607)

  • 1. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
    Pascal CB
    Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct. Baylor saga comes to an end.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5405):1091. PubMed ID: 10075561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inquiry finds misconduct by virus researcher; Gallo predicts appeal will overturn finding.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(6):723-4. PubMed ID: 8380877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.