These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8397993)

  • 21. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)].
    Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface.
    Chan DC; Lemke KC; Howell ML; Barghi N
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8957920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of home-use bleaching gels on fluoride releasing restorative materials.
    Cehreli ZC; Yazici R; García-Godoy F
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 14531608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The comparison of the effects of three types of piezoelectric ultrasonic tips and air polishing system on the filling materials: an in vitro study.
    Arabaci T; Ciçek Y; Ozgöz M; Canakçi V; Canakçi CF; Eltas A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Nov; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 17927632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [SEM study on the finishing of glass ionomer cement filling surfaces].
    Hannig M; Rahlf B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 1814729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R; Neiva G; Dennison J; Yaman P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study.
    Yli-Urpo H; Närhi M; Närhi T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):5934-41. PubMed ID: 15958240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surface wear on cervical restorations and adjacent enamel and root cementum caused by simulated long-term maintenance therapy.
    Rühling A; Wulf J; Schwahn C; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 15016258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of repeated fluoride varnish application on different restorative surfaces.
    Salama FS; Schulte KM; Iseman MF; Reinhardt JW
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):54-61. PubMed ID: 17091140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.