280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8398128)
1. Influence of recipient oocyte cell cycle stage on DNA synthesis, nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome constitution, and development in nuclear transplant bovine embryos.
Barnes FL; Collas P; Powell R; King WA; Westhusin M; Shepherd D
Mol Reprod Dev; 1993 Sep; 36(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8398128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclear transfer in sheep embryos: the effect of cell-cycle coordination between nucleus and cytoplasm and the use of in vitro matured oocytes.
Liu L; Dai Y; Moor RM
Mol Reprod Dev; 1997 Jul; 47(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 9170105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bovine nuclear transfer embryos: oocyte activation prior to blastomere fusion.
Stice SL; Keefer CL; Matthews L
Mol Reprod Dev; 1994 May; 38(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8049067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nuclear remodelling and early development in cryopreserved, porcine primordial germ cells following nuclear transfer into in vitro-matured oocytes.
Liu L; Moor RM; Laurie S; Notarianni E
Int J Dev Biol; 1995 Aug; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 8619962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors controlling the loss of immunoreactive somatic histone H1 from blastomere nuclei in oocyte cytoplasm: a potential marker of nuclear reprogramming.
Bordignon V; Clarke HJ; Smith LC
Dev Biol; 2001 May; 233(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 11319868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of enucleation and caffeine on maturation-promoting factor (MPF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activities in ovine oocytes used as recipient cytoplasts for nuclear transfer.
Lee JH; Campbell KH
Biol Reprod; 2006 Apr; 74(4):691-8. PubMed ID: 16371593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential effect of recipient cytoplasm for microtubule organization and preimplantation development in rat reconstituted embryos with two-cell embryonic cell nuclear transfer.
Shinozawa T; Mizutani E; Tomioka I; Kawahara M; Sasada H; Matsumoto H; Sato E
Mol Reprod Dev; 2004 Jul; 68(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 15112324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of recipient cytoplasm cell stage on transcription in bovine nucleus transfer embryos.
Smith SD; Soloy E; Kanka J; Holm P; Callesen H
Mol Reprod Dev; 1996 Dec; 45(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 8956282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nuclear transfer of synchronized african wild cat somatic cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes.
Gómez MC; Jenkins JA; Giraldo A; Harris RF; King A; Dresser BL; Pope CE
Biol Reprod; 2003 Sep; 69(3):1032-41. PubMed ID: 12773426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential cytoplast requirement for embryonic and somatic cell nuclear transfer in cattle.
Du F; Sung LY; Tian XC; Yang X
Mol Reprod Dev; 2002 Oct; 63(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 12203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo aging of oocytes influences the behavior of nuclei transferred to enucleated rabbit oocytes.
Adenot PG; Szöllösi MS; Chesné P; Chastant S; Renard JP
Mol Reprod Dev; 1997 Mar; 46(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 9041135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of activation treatments of recipient oocytes on subsequent development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos.
Atabay EC; Katagiri S; Nagano M; Takahashi Y
Jpn J Vet Res; 2003 Feb; 50(4):185-94. PubMed ID: 12675554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors involved in nuclear reprogramming during early development in the rabbit.
Pinto-Correia C; Long CR; Chang T; Robl JM
Mol Reprod Dev; 1995 Mar; 40(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 7772339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nucleolar ultrastructure in bovine nuclear transfer embryos.
Kanka J; Smith SD; Soloy E; Holm P; Callesen H
Mol Reprod Dev; 1999 Mar; 52(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 10206656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Activated bovine cytoplasts prepared by demecolcine-induced enucleation support development of nuclear transfer embryos in vitro.
Russell DF; Ibáñez E; Albertini DF; Overström EW
Mol Reprod Dev; 2005 Oct; 72(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 16007680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remodeling of donor nuclei, DNA-synthesis, and ploidy of bovine cumulus cell nuclear transfer embryos: effect of activation protocol.
Alberio R; Brero A; Motlík J; Cremer T; Wolf E; Zakhartchenko V
Mol Reprod Dev; 2001 Aug; 59(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 11468773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavior of M-phase synchronized blastomeres after nuclear transfer in cattle.
Alberio R; Motlik J; Stojkovic M; Wolf E; Zakhartchenko V
Mol Reprod Dev; 2000 Sep; 57(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 10954854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of time after the removal of nocodazole from nuclear donors on the development of reconstituted embryos in bovine nuclear transplantation.
Tanaka H; Takahashi Y; Hishinuma M; Kanagawa H
Jpn J Vet Res; 1995 Dec; 43(3-4):135-43. PubMed ID: 8901030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nuclear-cytoplasmic interaction and development of goat embryos reconstructed by nuclear transplantation: production of goats by serially cloning embryos.
Yong Z; Yuqiang L
Biol Reprod; 1998 Jan; 58(1):266-9. PubMed ID: 9472951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Premature chromosome condensation is not essential for nuclear reprogramming in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Sung LY; Shen PC; Jeong BS; Xu J; Chang CC; Cheng WT; Wu JS; Lee SN; Broek D; Faber D; Tian XC; Yang X; Du F
Biol Reprod; 2007 Feb; 76(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 17108336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
