These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8399053)

  • 1. The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system: Part I.
    Lowey MN
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 20(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 8399053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system. Part II: Study cast mensuration.
    Lowey MN
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Nov; 20(4):315-31. PubMed ID: 8286301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric analysis comparing five different methods.
    Oliver RG
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Nov; 18(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 1782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
    Turner PJ; Weerakone S
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical appraisal of measurement of the soft tissue outline using photographs and video.
    Benson PE; Richmond S
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 19(4):397-409. PubMed ID: 9308261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The study of automatic cephalometric analysis system].
    Zhang X; Zhang Z; Zhang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 34(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 11834164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The automation of the processing and interpreting of teleroentgenograms].
    Zhulev EN; Pestrikova VN; Plekhanov AA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1998; 77(6):46-8. PubMed ID: 10067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted cephalometric analysis.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 May; 105(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 8166104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
    Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method--a preliminary study.
    Singh P; Davies TI
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 20923935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An approach for the automatic cephalometric landmark detection using mathematical morphology and active appearance models.
    Rueda S; Alcañiz M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):159-66. PubMed ID: 17354886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms.
    Macrì V; Wenzel A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 8500539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
    Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced speed and precision of measurement in a computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system.
    Chen SK; Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Aug; 74(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 15387028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.