These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8399053)

  • 41. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative study of manual and computerized cephalometric analyses.
    Dana JM; Goldstein M; Burch JG; Hardigan PC
    J Clin Orthod; 2004 May; 38(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 15178884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of beam collimation in lateral radiographic cephalometry.
    Liu YT; Gravely JF
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 1911689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Linearity of cephalometric digitizers.
    Eriksen E; Solow B
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Oct; 13(5):337-42. PubMed ID: 1748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
    Prawat JS; Nieberg L; Cisneros GJ; Acs G
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
    Erkan M; Gurel HG; Nur M; Demirel B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 21502380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
    Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
    Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of radiographic magnification in lateral cephalograms obtained with different X-ray devices: experimental study in human dry skull.
    Rino Neto J; de Paiva JB; Queiroz GV; Attizzani MF; Miasiro Junior H
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 18(2):17.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23916445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Profile enhancement and cephalometric landmark identification.
    Burger HJ; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 8135208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of hand-tracing and cephalometric analysis computer programs with and without advanced features--accuracy and time demands.
    Tsorovas G; Karsten AL
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 20554891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An evaluation of the J.O.E. cephalometric software.
    Dreyer CW
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Oct; 13(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 8975658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
    Kusnoto B
    Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
    Schirmer UR; Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 9423701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report.
    Jackson PH; Dickson GC; Birnie DJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):122-32. PubMed ID: 3860252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Liu JK; Chen YT; Cheng KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.