These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8399698)

  • 21. E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys.
    Seguin R; Godwin M; MacDonald S; McCall M
    Can Fam Physician; 2004 Mar; 50():414-9. PubMed ID: 15318679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surveying general practitioners: a new avenue.
    Jiwa M; Coker AE; Bagley J; Freeman J; Coleman M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Mar; 20(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 15025840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect on response rates of stamps vs a pre-printed business reply envelope in a mailed follow-up survey among middle-aged Danish men.
    Osler M; Juhl M; Lund R; Andersen AM; Kriegbaum M; Christensen U
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1156-7. PubMed ID: 18356194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eliciting survey cooperation: incentives, self-interest, and norms of cooperation.
    Kropf ME; Blair J
    Eval Rev; 2005 Dec; 29(6):559-75. PubMed ID: 16244052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.
    Whiteman MK; Langenberg P; Kjerulff K; McCarter R; Flaws JA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):821-8. PubMed ID: 14588132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mode of delivery, but not questionnaire length, affected response in an epidemiological study of eating-disordered behavior.
    Mond JM; Rodgers B; Hay PJ; Owen C; Beumont PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1167-71. PubMed ID: 15567633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.
    Delnevo CD; Abatemarco DJ; Steinberg MB
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 26(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 15026104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
    Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; de Groen PC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 12809822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Elective caesarean delivery at maternal request: a preliminary study of motivations influencing women's decision-making.
    Robson S; Carey A; Mishra R; Dear K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Aug; 48(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 18837848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Survey response inducements for registered nurses.
    Hill CA; Fahrney K; Wheeless SC; Carson CP
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 16585808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Handwritten 'post-it' notes, questionnaire formats and response to a postal questionnaire survey.
    Cowie L; Morgan M; Gulliford M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 40(1):254-5. PubMed ID: 20308038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fate of incorrectly addressed mailed questionnaires.
    Sandler RS; Holland KL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 2319279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. International questionnaire postal response rate: an experiment comparing no return postage to provision of International Postage Vouchers--"Coupon-Réponse International".
    Carling C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Jul; 4(1):16. PubMed ID: 15238155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2).
    Leece P; Bhandari M; Sprague S; Swiontkowski MF; Schemitsch EH; Tornetta P; Devereaux PJ; Guyatt GH
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e30. PubMed ID: 15471756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving response rate to mailed questionnaires.
    Gordon SE; Stokes SA
    Nurs Res; 1989; 38(6):375-6. PubMed ID: 2587295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect on survey return rates of having a signed or unsigned postcard as the third-wave mailing.
    Price JH; Dake JA; Akpanudo S; Kleinfelder J
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):1099-102. PubMed ID: 12931924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mail survey response by smoking status.
    Seltzer CC; Bosse R; Garvey AJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1974 Dec; 100(6):453-7. PubMed ID: 4447109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Response rates and non-response bias in a health-related mailed survey].
    Nakai S; Hashimoto S; Murakami Y; Hayashi M; Manabe K; Noda H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1997 Mar; 44(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 9175409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.