These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8400567)

  • 1. Susceptibility effects in porous media in the presence of flow.
    Su MY; Nalcioglu O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 8400567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical description of microcirculatory flow as measured with an MR method.
    Su MY; Nalcioglu O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(6):883-7. PubMed ID: 8280978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stochastic effects on single phase fluid flow in porous media.
    Mansfield P; Bencsik M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):333-7. PubMed ID: 11445308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A rotating phantom for the study of flow effects in MR imaging.
    Nordell B; Ståhlberg F; Ericsson A; Ranta C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 2850436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concentration and velocity field measurements by magnetic resonance imaging in aperiodic heterogeneous porous media.
    Irwin NC; Altobelli SA; Greenkorn RA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jul; 17(6):909-17. PubMed ID: 10402598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct measurement of porous media local hydrodynamical permeability using gas MRI.
    Bencsik M; Ramanathan C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):379-83. PubMed ID: 11445315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI investigation of water-oil two phase flow in straight capillary, bifurcate channel and monolayered glass bead pack.
    Liu Y; Jiang L; Zhu N; Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Wang D; Yang M; Zhao J; Song Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):918-26. PubMed ID: 25940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of porous media flow functions using NMR imaging data.
    Kulkarni R; Watson AT; Nordtvedt JE
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 16(5-6):707-9. PubMed ID: 9803946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow effects in multislice, spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Model, experimental verification, and clinical examples.
    Williams DM; Meyer CR; Schreiner RJ
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Aug; 22(8):642-50. PubMed ID: 3667171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance visualisation of single- and two-phase flow in porous media.
    Sederman AJ; Gladden LF
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):339-43. PubMed ID: 11445309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dispersion measurements using time-of-flight remote detection MRI.
    Granwehr J; Harel E; Hilty C; Garcia S; Chavez L; Pines A; Sen PN; Song YQ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 17466761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internal magnetic gradient fields in glass bead packs from numerical simulations and constant time diffusion spin echo measurements.
    Winkler M; Zhou M; Bernardo M; Endeward B; Thomann H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003; 21(3-4):311-5. PubMed ID: 12850724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluid transport in glass beads phantoms: spatial velocity measurements and confirmation of the stochastic model.
    Bencsik M; Issa B; al-Mugheiry MA; Bowtell RW; Mansfield P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 16(5-6):605-7. PubMed ID: 9803919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flow imaging of fluids in porous media by magnetization prepared centric-scan SPRITE.
    Li L; Chen Q; Marble AE; Romero-Zerón L; Newling B; Balcom BJ
    J Magn Reson; 2009 Mar; 197(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19121591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Susceptibility magnetic resonance imaging using spectral decomposition.
    Ro YM; Cho ZH
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Apr; 33(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 7776883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow and diffusion imaging in porous media.
    Rajanayagam V; Yao S; Pope JM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 13(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 8569447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spin echo SPI methods for quantitative analysis of fluids in porous media.
    Li L; Han H; Balcom BJ
    J Magn Reson; 2009 Jun; 198(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 19307140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model to interpret pulsed-field-gradient NMR data including memory and superdispersion effects.
    Néel MC; Bauer D; Fleury M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(6):062121. PubMed ID: 25019739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of spatially-resolved porosity, tracer distributions and diffusion coefficients in porous media using MRI measurements and numerical simulations.
    Marica F; Jofré SA; Mayer KU; Balcom BJ; Al TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Jul; 125(1-4):47-56. PubMed ID: 21669472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterisation of fluid flow through porous media using three-dimensional microimaging and pulsed gradient stimulated echo NMR.
    Manz B; Alexander P; Warren PB; Gladden LF
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 16(5-6):673-5. PubMed ID: 9803937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.