190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8401751)
1. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
Chumlea WC; Roche AF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter and intra-reliability of ultrasonography for the measurement of abdominal subcutaneous & visceral adipose tissue thickness at 12 weeks gestation.
Cremona A; Hayes K; O'Gorman CS; Laighin CN; Ismail KI; Donnelly AE; Hamilton J; Cotter A
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 31847832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of four techniques for measuring central adiposity in postpartum adolescents.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Stamm E; Scherzinger A
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11444792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue by simple and portable field instruments: Skinfolds versus A-mode ultrasound measurements.
Pérez-Chirinos Buxadé C; Solà-Perez T; Castizo-Olier J; Carrasco-Marginet M; Roy A; Marfell-Jones M; Irurtia A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205226. PubMed ID: 30496211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in man.
Jones PR; Davies PS; Norgan NG
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 3544856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility and validity of ultrasound for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues.
Schlecht I; Wiggermann P; Behrens G; Fischer B; Koch M; Freese J; Rubin D; Nöthlings U; Stroszczynski C; Leitzmann MF
Metabolism; 2014 Dec; 63(12):1512-9. PubMed ID: 25242434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of the ultrasonic technique as a method of measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Haymes EM; Lundegren HM; Loomis JL; Buskirk ER
Ann Hum Biol; 1976 May; 3(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 962304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
Ramirez ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra-abdominal adipose tissue in young children.
Goran MI; Kaskoun M; Shuman WP
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 Apr; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7627253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study.
Tornaghi G; Raiteri R; Pozzato C; Rispoli A; Bramani M; Cipolat M; Craveri A
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Nov; 18(11):771-5. PubMed ID: 7866479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reproducibility of ultrasonography for the measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue.
Stolk RP; Wink O; Zelissen PM; Meijer R; van Gils AP; Grobbee DE
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1346-51. PubMed ID: 11571598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High inter-observer reliability in standardized ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue in children aged three to six years.
Kelso A; Müller W; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Sengeis M; Ahammer H; Steinacker JM
BMC Pediatr; 2020 Apr; 20(1):145. PubMed ID: 32241257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel method for measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound in children - interobserver consistency.
ChiriŢă-Emandi A; Papa MC; Abrudan L; Dobrescu MA; Puiu M; Velea IP; Paul C
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2017; 58(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 28523306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonography detection of small intra-abdominal fat variations.
Armellini F; Zamboni M; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Robbi R; De Marchi M; Bosello O
Int J Obes; 1991 Dec; 15(12):847-52. PubMed ID: 1794927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
